My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-22-2003 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
01-22-2003 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 1:26:28 PM
Creation date
7/18/2008 3:26:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JANUARY 22, 2003 <br />RESOI. UTION NO. 2003-1-20 -DENYING THE AMENDMENT TO <br />CONDITIONAL U.SE PERMIT FOR 2935 EDGERTON STREET <br />REQUESTED 73Y ]3RETT PIRKOLA GIVEN THERE LS NO BASIS <br />FOR AMENDING THE CUPA.S THE CIRCUMSTANCES FROM <br />THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF TILE ORIGINAL. CUP HAVE NOT <br />CHANGED, AND REQUIRING THAT THE GARAGE DOOR MUST <br />13E INSTALLED 73YAUC,UST I, 2003 <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Montour. <br />Ayes (3) Fahey, Montour, LaValle. <br />Nays (2) Blesener, Anderson. Resolution declared adopted. <br />CONCEPT Mayor Fahey opened the Concept Review for Hamel Court, asingle- <br />REVIEW - family development consisting of from four to eight single-family lots. <br />HAMEL It was noted that the Planning Commission recommended approval of <br />COURT Revised Concept B, consisting of eight lots, with Concept A as an <br />alternative. <br />I{ris Krengel, representing the Hamel family, reported that in addition to <br />the Hamel property, they are negotiating a purchase agreement for the tri- <br />plex property to the north. Developing both of these sites would allow for <br />the eight-lot development. However, given that the purchase of the tri- <br />plex property has not been finalized, Krengel requested that the Council <br />also consider Concept A as well. <br />Blesener noted that it appears the proposed cul-de-sac abuts the Leibel <br />property. Krengel reported that the drawing is preliminary at this point, <br />and the cul-de-sac will likely move away from the Leibel property. <br />Fahey asked if there was any additional developable land that should be <br />considered as part of this proposal. Krengel reported that given the grades <br />of the property to the east, there is no additional developable land to add. <br />I{rengel pointed out that they are proposing access for these lots Twin <br />Lake Road. Given the steep grades to Twin Lake Blvd., Krengel did not <br />feel it was practical to have the access come in from that direction. <br />Blesener expressed concern with adding eight houses onto a long cul-de- <br />sac, and felt that access from Twin Lake Blvd. would be preferable. <br />Fahey suggested that the City Engineer look at the grades and comment on <br />whether or not it would be feasible to bring the access in from Twin Lake <br />Blvd. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.