My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-23-2003 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
04-23-2003 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 1:27:39 PM
Creation date
7/18/2008 3:29:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCII, <br />APRIL 23, 2003 <br />Blesener asked what the City mighC give up in waiving the right-of-way <br />permit requirement other than the permit fee. The City Administrator <br />suggested that in renegotiating the franchise agreement, the City could <br />require better protection on the relocation of utilities away from public <br />improvement projects. The City has experienced some difficulty in <br />addressing this issue with Xcel and a renegotiated franchise agreement <br />would provide an opportunity to spell this out. <br />Blesener pointed out provision 4.2 in the New Brighton agreement and <br />asked if it pertained to light rail. The Administrator thought it did and was <br />an attempt by Xcel to protect itself in this regard. <br />Fahey noted that the City has the ability to amend its ordinance and <br />impose franchise fees without giving away any rights. Fahey stated that <br />he was reluctant renegotiate a franchise agreement with Xcel that would <br />involve precluding future possibilities such as the location of a light rail <br />transit hub in Little Canada. Fahey stated that if a franchise agreement can <br />be renegotiated that is fair and not unduly restrictive, he would support it. <br />Otherwise, the City can renegotiate the ordinance and impose a 3.5% <br />franchise fee on the gas and electric utilities. <br />Anderson questioned getting into this issue before the City knows the <br />outcome of legislative actions on the budget. Anderson stated that his first <br />preference would be to increase the levy. Fahey agreed, but suggested that <br />the negotiation process should begin so that the City is ready to act, if <br />necessary. Montour pointed out that the City can move through the <br />process and impose a 0% franchise fee on gas and electric for this year so <br />that the mechanics are in place to begin collecting this fee in the future <br />should the need arise. <br />Blesener suggested that the process start and that two target dates be <br />established. Blesener suggested information be gathered, negotiations <br />conducted, and either an ordinance put in place or a renegotiated franchise <br />agreement be entered into by July with the goal that franchise fees would <br />begin to be collected by September. Blesener pointed out that there are a <br />lot of factors that will impact whether or not the City implements franchise <br />fees on gas and electric, and, if so, the level of those fees. Some of these <br />factors include the State budget impact to the City, the status of trail grant <br />applications, etc. <br />Mr. Blesener introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2003-4-8~-AUTHORIZING TILE CITY <br />ADMINISTRATOR TO BEGIN NEGOTIATIONS WITH XCEL <br />ENERGY ON BOTH ELECTRIC AND GAS FRANCIIISE FEES <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.