Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JULY 28, 2003 <br />o The ditch and pond were sold to the property owners. No <br />one has maintained either area since this occurred. <br />o Frattalone installed the ditch -west and south side of berm. <br />o No maintenance of the ditch has been done in 18 years. <br />o Then after lots sold, the north side of berm was filled in. <br />o The pond was to be two feet lower than 859 elevation that <br />originally existed. That two feet of materials was never <br />removed. <br />Aichinger agreed that things weren't done correctly and the ditch has not <br />been maintained. However, he was unsure what the next step should be. <br />Sculley indicated that land that had been used for 50 years and it is now <br />under water. Access to a portion of his property has been cut off by the <br />water. <br />The City Engineer pointed out problems in comparing past topographical <br />information from various surveys. He noted that they were not based on <br />the same datum. Therefore, one survey may show an elevation at 861 and <br />another may show it at 859 even though no change had occurred. <br />Pogreba felt the problem could be solved very simply. He noted that the <br />construction of the berm stopped the flow of water that used to get to the <br />center of the existing pond. This forced water around the berm. <br />Therefore, removing the berm would solve the problem. <br />LaValle asked what has happened given the Sculley's can no longer <br />access portions of their property that they used to? <br />Aichinger replied that what was wetland is still wetland. There has been <br />more development in the area; therefore, there is a greater volume of <br />water. If land does not dry out, then there is more wetland vegetation. <br />The weather cycle is also a factor, and the area is in a wetter cycle now <br />than 15 years before. <br />The City Administrator explained the potential to divert water that comes <br />from the north back toward the freeway as part of the Unweave the Weave <br />project. <br />Aichinger noted the berm was constructed illegally before the Watershed's <br />existence. Tt was pointed out that at the time the berm was constructed, <br />the Corps of Engineers was the only enforcing authority. Sculley noted <br />that the ditch on their property was constructed without their permission. <br />