Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />OCTOBER 8, 2003 <br />and informed the Council that he will not tear it down. Cossack suggested <br />that another option he has for connecting his house and the recreation <br />building would be to construct a covered passageway between the two <br />structures. However, the Building Official will not allow him to do this. <br />The City Administrator indicated that the Building Official's position was <br />that the connection would have to conform to building code requirements <br />and no plans have been submitted to evaluate this possibility. <br />Fahey noted that Mr. Cossack did not apply for a building permit for the <br />recreation building prior to construction. Cossack indicated that the City <br />would not let him apply for a building permit until he got approval of <br />variances for the recreation building. <br />Fahey noted that Ivlr. Cossack made a serious mistake iu constructing this <br />building without a building permit. Fahey also noted that once <br />construction started, City staff told Mr. Cossack to stop construction, <br />however, he ignored this direction and continued with construction. Fahey <br />pointed out the options available as outlined in the City Administrator's <br />letter to Mr. Cossack dated September 25, 2003. <br />Cossack noted that he applied for variances for the recreation building and <br />apologized for not attending the Council's September 24'x' meeting at <br />which the variance requests were considered. Blesener indicated that the <br />fact that Mr. Cossack was not in attendance did not impact the Council's <br />decision to deny the variance requests. The fact is there are no hardships <br />present to warrant granting of these variances. <br />Cossack felt the hardship was that his property abuts athree-story <br />apartment building and that building is in a deteriorating condition. <br />Cossack felt that what he is trying to do with his property would insulate it <br />from the condition of the adjacent property. Cossack felt that he was <br />entitled to the same privacy in his back yard that everyone else has. <br />Cossack noted that the fence he has constructed on his property is higher <br />on the back of his lot to prevent people from the apartment building from <br />jumping over the fence and trespassing on his property. <br />Fahey noted that there a~~e strict standards governing the granting of <br />variances, and these standards have not been met. Fahey also noted that <br />the City has to be consistent in the treatment of property owners within the <br />City. Fahey stated that it is clear that Mr. Cossack was informed by City <br />staff over a long period of time that the building was being constructed <br />illegally. Mr. Cossack chose to ignore staff's direction and now is faced <br />with the options as outlined in the September 25°i letter. <br />