10-08-2003 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 8, 2003 It was also noted that the property owners, Mathew and Stephanie Galba and Patrick St. George, will need a conditional use permit for the amount of garage space that they are proposing to construct. Stephanie Galba indicated that their plans have changed somewhat in that they will attach all the garage space to the house, rather than having a detached garage. Galba indicated they are proposing to construct 1,498 square feet of garage and the Code allows between 1,000 and 1,500 square feet by Conditional Use Permit. Fahey indicated that the end result will be an improvement to the property and will eliminate several non-conforming issues that currently exist. Fahey also suggested that the property owners meet with the City Planner and Building Official to ensure that their plans do not require any variances. Anderson questioned the Timely removal of the house at 2576 Edgerton Street. It was noted that the property owner will deposit $15,000 with the City to ensure that the house is removed. Mr. LaValle introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOI UTION NO. 2003-LO-230 -APPROVING THE DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT FOR 2576 AND 2580 EDGERTON STREET AS RECOMMENDED 73Y THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR SUI3.IECT TO REVIF.WAND APPROVAL. 73Y THE CITY ATTORNEY The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Anderson. Ayes (5) LaValle, Anderson, Fahey, Montour, Blesener. Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. OLD FIRE The Council noted that the request for amendment to the Old Fire Hall HALL USE Use Policy will be considered at the October 22, 2003 Council meeting POLICY in order to give the City staff an opportunity to make a recommendation on this matter. CHANGE The City Administrator reported that he is still waiting for information ORDER FOR on the issue of debris removal in conjunction with the Market Place MARKET PLACE Drive improvement project. Once he has that information, he will make DEBRIS a recommendation to the Council on the potential for recovery of these REMOVAL costs. However, in the meantime, the contractor should be paid for the work that was done.