Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />DECEMBER 1, 2003 <br />The Administrator reviewed 2004 General Fund expense highlights noting <br />that expenses are projected to increase by 5.8%. Impacts to expenses <br />include increased Fire Department costs, the fact that 2004 is an election <br />year, an increase in Public Works expense of 6.9% and an increase in law <br />enforcement costs of 5.5%. Expense increases average 4.76% over the <br />last several years with the City absorbing some large increases in the area <br />of public safety. <br />The Administrator compared per capita spending of Ramsey County cities <br />for all basic services. That comparison shows Little Canada as the lowest, <br />with a per capita rate of $213. <br />The Administrator reviewed the components that made up the total 2004 <br />proposed budget of $8,465,298. These include the General Fund at <br />$2,301,172, Parks & Rec/Cable TV Funds at $200,194, Sewer & Water <br />Funds at $2,312,270, Capital Improvement Funds at $3,157,329, and Debt <br />Service Funds at $494,333. <br />The Administrator next reviewed the allocation of City taxes on a <br />$161,500 home (Little Canada's median value) which amount to $423.94. <br />He also reviewed the impact of City taxes on various valued residential <br />and commercial/industrial properties in Little Canada considering a 0% <br />valuation increase. In both comparisons, these properties would see a <br />4.69% decrease in the City's share of their property tax bill. The <br />Administrator noted that a 12% increase in the valuation of a residential <br />property would result in a 6.75% increase in the City's share of property <br />taxes. <br />The Administrator reviewed the taxing jurisdictions in Little Canada <br />which include the City, School District (623 or 624), Ramsey County and <br />special taxing jurisdictions that include the Metropolitan Council, <br />Metropolitan Mosquito Control, Regional Transit Board, and <br />Ramsey/Washington Watershed District. He noted that the distribution of <br />the property tax dollar on a median valued home is 44% County, 29% <br />School District, 22% City, and 5% special taxingjurisdictions. Taking <br />into account the total tax bill, residential properties with no valuation <br />increase will see a 2.59% reduction in their property tax bill. Residential <br />properties with a 12% valuation increase will see a 9.10% tax increase. <br />Commercial properties with no valuation increase will see an <br />approximately 2.3% decrease in taxes. <br />The Administrator noted that some of the impacts to future property taxes <br />might include increasing residential property values, the continued phase <br />out of limited market value cap, tax reform where a shift of burden to <br />