My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-23-2015 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
11-23-2015 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/4/2016 4:06:04 PM
Creation date
1/4/2016 4:05:51 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />NOVEMBER 23, 2015 <br />noted that with these changes, the total levy increase is 3.52%, and that <br />includes dealing with the $29,600. <br />City Administrator stated that the Council had talked about wanting the <br />levy increase to be 3% or lower, and by his estimate, it would take roughly <br />$15,289 deduction from the budget to get down to 3%. City Administrator <br />stated that Councilmember Torkelson had asked about lowering certain <br />budget amounts. City Administrator recommended keeping the same <br />dollar amount for election judges because the upcoming presidential <br />election will likely have a high turnout. He recommended keeping the <br />same dollar amount for administration supplies since it is based on what <br />the average has been for the last four years. City Administrator suggested <br />that the amount for postage could be dropped by $1,000. He stated there <br />had been a suggestion of reducing the cost of the City Attorney advance, <br />but he noted that the amount is used as a place holder in the budget <br />because the cost varies every month. The City Attorney costs an average <br />of about $5,000 a month, and maybe it could be dropped by $500, but it <br />depends on how much work the attorney is needed for. City <br />Administrator stated that Councilmember Torkelson also asked about the <br />new city public works building heating budget and could it be lowered. <br />City Administrator stated that amount should not be reduced this year <br />since the building has only been open for a few months and hasn't gone <br />through a winter yet, and it is unknown what the costs will end up at. He <br />noted the last item asked about was the temporary park employees, which <br />is mainly the rink attendants. These costs depend on the weather and how <br />long the rinks are actually open. City Administrator stated that with these <br />small changes, it brings the amount down to about $t2,000 that would be <br />needed to lower the levy increase to 3%. <br />City Administrator stated that we could transfer $10,000 from the cable <br />fund, but Councilmember Montour doesn't think this is a good idea. He <br />stated that the internal plantier position could be eliminated, then a new <br />part-time utility billing clerk would not be needed. Other budget reducing <br />options are with Parks and Recreation administration. He stated that a <br />part-time assistant position could be cut, or reduce the parks director down <br />to half time, which would also save additional health insurance costs. <br />City Administrator stated that the costs for the Old Fire Hall are on the <br />capital improvement side. The building is currently used as a rental hall <br />downstairs and equipment storage upstairs. City Administrator stated the <br />annual operating costs were $7,800 in 2013, $8,700 in 2014, and were <br />budgeted to be $10,600 in 2015, but the final numbers are not in yet. He <br />noted that it can be assumed that the annual operating costs will continue <br />to run around $10,000 per year going forward. He stated that the Council <br />had asked about looking at the rest of building's condition and other needs <br />0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.