Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />JUNF, 12, 2003 <br />Knudsen recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit allowing <br />the sale of f reworks from a tent in the Market Place Shopping Center <br />parking lot as requested by FW Shreveport subject to compliance with the <br />recommendations of the City Planner and the;~ire Chief, conditioned that <br />a fireworks sales license remain in place each year in conjunction with the <br />Conditional Use Permit, subject to all signage for tine fireworks sales be <br />attached to the tent itself, and subject to future relocation of the tent in <br />response to any parking concerns that may arise. <br />Motion seconded by Wojcik. <br />Motion carried 4 to 3. Keis, Knudsen, Barraclough, Wojcik voted in <br />favor. Dm'ay, Roycraft, Weihe voted against. <br />REZONING- The Commission reviewed the request of Lee & Lee Enterprises for the <br />5 EAST rezoning of their property located at 5 Gast County Road B from Business- <br />COUNTY Warehouse (B-w) to General Business (B-3). The City Planner indicated <br />ROAD B - that the rezoning request is consistent with the land use plan and the <br />LEE ~l LEE Comprehensive Plan, and is appropriate given the surrounding land uses. <br />ENTERPRISES <br />There was no one from the general public present wishing to convnent on <br />this matter. <br />Knudsen reconnnended approval of the rezoning of 5 Gast County Road B <br />from Business-Warehouse (B-W) to General Business (B-3). <br />Mofio^ seconded by Wojcik. <br />Motion carried 7 - 0. <br />PRELIMINARY Mr. Ed Inman, 785 LaBore Road, requested that the Commission approve <br />& F.[NAL PLAT- a preliminary and final plat for the Inman Addition so that he can develop <br />1NMAN two single-family Iols. Mr. Inman reported that his daughters would like <br />ADD.ITiON to build homes on these lots. Access to these lots would be via the <br />development of Allan Avenue extending from the intersection of <br />Greenbrier Street. <br />Keis asked how the road improvement would be paid for. Inman indicated <br />that the road would be improved privately. The Planner indicated that Mr. <br />Inman would pay for the construction of the street. The street would be <br />put in privately, but would become a public City street. Given that the <br />road improvement is being done privately, there would be no assessment <br />for this improvement The Planner indicated that he was not sure what <br />-4- <br />