06-12-2003 Planning Comm. Minutes

Home Browse Search

MINUTES PLANNING COl\9MISSTON JUN)L 12, 2003 Roycraft asked if Inman was aware of the costs for putting Allan Avenue in and if he was willing to absorb the total cost. Inman replied that bids have not yet been obtained for the improvement, but pointed out that it will be less expensive to put the street in privately. Inman again expressed concern that he was being required to dedicate 25 feet for the future improvement of Leeward Way as it abuts the two lots he is proposing. Inman questioned why the Lancette's are not being required to make the same dedication. Keis pointed out that while the hvnan's are seeking a plat approval at this time, the Lancette's are not. The Tnman's disputed the City Engineer's recommendation relative to a cut-de-sac at the end of Allan Avenue, pointing out that a temporary cul- de-sac was required for Leeward Way. The Ltman's indicated that Allan Avenue will connect to Leeward Way at the time that it is extended. The lnman's again stated their opposition to dedicating 25-feet ofright-of--way for the future extension of Leeward Way abutting the two proposed lots. The Planner again explained the need to conform to the thoroughfare plan for the area and that this subdivision presents the opportunity to acquire a portion of the needed right-of--way for Leeward Way. No right-of way is being requested of the Lancette's at this time because they have not requested a subdivision of their property. Duray pointed out that platting the 25 feet as an outlot should address the Inman's concerns as they would be able to retain title to the property until Leeward Way is extended. Lunan again oUjected to dedication of the 25 feet pointing out that the Lancette's are not being required to dedicate their half of the right-of--way. Keis noted that the Lancette's are not requesting any platting or zoning actions. Keis pointed out that Inman's are making a request; therefore, it is the City's opportunity to obtain a portion of Che Leeward Way right-of- way. Eric Weisman, Edgerton Street, took issue with the way that Little Canada is being developed and urged the Commission to consider more responsible development. Weisman noted that development can he either regressive or progressive. He felt it very critical that trees be retained in the City for both humans and wildlife. Weisman urged the Commission to keep in mind the other creatures that live in Little Canada and to leave six to eight trees on properties being developed. -7-