My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-12-2003 Planning Comm. Minutes
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
06-12-2003 Planning Comm. Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2008 2:02:23 PM
Creation date
7/22/2008 1:48:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M,INiJT1;S <br />PLANNING COMM1SSiON <br />JUNIā¢;12, 2003 <br />dedicated that this time, and suggested that the dedication could be <br />delayed until Leeward Way is extended. Inman main stated that his <br />concern was the loss of privacy and the public's right to use this right-of- <br />way. <br />Duray asI<ed how Inman felt about the Planner's suggestion that the 25 <br />feet be platted as an outlot for dedication to the City when Leeward Way <br />is extended. Inman indicated that he would be agreeable to that. <br />Keis pointed out that from the City's perspective, it is trying to plan ahead <br />for the eventual extension of Leeward Way. <br />Keis asked if there was anyone from the general public wishing to <br />comment on this matter. <br />Debby Lancette, 791 LaE3ore Road, indicated that she supported Che <br />dedication of the 25 feet of right-of way from the Inman property at this <br />time rather than the outlot option. Lancette felt the right-of=way <br />dedication should occur now rather than delaying the issue into the future. <br />Lancette also asked how sewer and water service would be provided for <br />these two lots. <br />Weihe asked why Lancette opposed the outlot option. Lancette stated that <br />her concern would be that there would be costs associated with obtaining <br />this right-of=way via the outlot option which would be avoided if the right- <br />of-way were dedicated at this time. <br />The City Planner indicated that the only way the outlot option would work <br />is if there is a contract in place with provides for the conversion of the <br />outlot to public right-ofway at the time Leeward Way is developed. This <br />contract would be binding on the current and future owners of the outlot. <br />Debhy Lancette requested that barriers be posted at the deadend of both <br />:Leeward Way and the proposed Allan Avenue. She informed the <br />Commission that there is a great deal of trespassing at the back of her <br />property by people using ATVs. Lancette pointed out that the <br />improvement of Allan Avenue brings another access into her property. <br />Lancette felt that the barriers would deter the use of the property until such <br />time as Leeward Way is further improvement and the area is developed- <br />Lancette also asked if there would be any cost to her for the improvement <br />of Allan Avenue. "the City Planner pointed out that Allan Avenue is being <br />proposed as a private improvement, therefore there would be no <br />assessments. <br />-6- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.