My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-02-2002 Parks Commission Agenda
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
05-02-2002 Parks Commission Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2008 10:51:57 AM
Creation date
7/23/2008 10:43:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
•:• Based upon current zoning considerations, it appears that to prevent development on this <br />parcel, acquisition by some parry will be necessary. If the City is to acquire this site, we <br />should have an indication of value before proceeding. It is unlikely we can acquire this <br />parcel for $30,000 paid by the Palmen's given that Lot 1, Block 1 of the Mid Oaks <br />subdivision creates access (and development potential to the balance of the property.) <br />Therefore, an appraisal would be necessary to properly gauge this value keeping in mind that <br />without detailed development submittals and evaluations, some major assumptions regarding <br />development potential would need to be made. <br />•A Is this the best/only piece of land we should be considering from an open space perspective'? <br />Do other properties provide greater potential for citywide benefit? (i.e. the Sculley Property) <br />ti• If acquisition is to proceed, what priorities will be shifted to fund the purchase, assuming we <br />can not achieve an outside source of funding? <br />It is clear this piece of property has had the attention of the City for quite awhile. It is also clear that there <br />is support from this neighborhood to acquire the parcel to ensure development does not occur in order to <br />protect its natural resources. However, I feel we need to proceed cautiously to ensure a solid decision is <br />made. Therefore, it is my recommendation that if the City Council feels we should pursue the acquisition <br />of this property, then a joint workshop should be held with the Parks & Recreation Commission to discuss <br />the issues raised in this memo to provide an orderly approach to our park acquisition/development <br />program. <br />cc: George LeTendre <br />Barbara Allen <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.