Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMlSS10N <br />JANUARY 10, 2002 <br />there will be electricity and heat. No work will be done inside the <br />building, it will be used for the storage of vehicles. Strohbeen pointed out <br />the Planner's comments about off-street parking. Strohbeen felt that no <br />additional off-street parking would be necessary. <br />The City Planner indicated that there may be adequate parking on the site. <br />However, the plan does not show the parking areas, and he requested that <br />the plan be modified to designate the off-street parking. <br />Nick Strohbeen reported that the location of the proposed building on the <br />plan has been changed. The building will be about 30 feet further east, <br />closer to Noel Drive. <br />Keis indicated that the plan will have to be modified to show exact <br />building location, off=street parking, and required landscaping. Keis <br />indicated that he had no problem with the rezoning given the property is <br />put to an auto-related use. Keis asked about City control over what <br />happens on the site. <br />The City Planner indicated that the B-2 zoning requires a CUP if the <br />property owners planned to add to the building or intensify the use of the <br />property. Therefore, the City would still retain the control it needs. <br />Duray asked about building materials. 7"he City Planner reported that the <br />commercial district requires a masonry veneer of any sw~faces facing the <br />public street. The building proposed has a lot less brick than what would <br />typically be required. The Planner noted, however, that Che principle <br />building is primarily metal-sided. <br />Knudsen asked if the City would allow the storage building to be built in <br />conformance with the principle building, or would a compromise be made <br />to bring the storage building closer to the requirements of the Zoning <br />District. <br />Strohbeen pointed out that they want to make the building aesthetically <br />pleasing and would side it with steel or aluminum siding. Knudsen <br />indicated that the City may require more brick on the building. Keis noted <br />that stucco may be an option. The Planner indicated that special attention <br />will be needed to the Noel Drive exposure. <br />Keis reconvnended tabling action on the Rezoning and CUP amendment <br />until the February 14~~' Planning Commission meeting and instructing the <br />applicant to work with the City Planner to revise the site plan as <br />recommended showing off-street parking as well as exact building <br />location as well as addressing the issue of architectw~al issues discussed. <br />~~ <br />