My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-08-2002 Planning Comm. Minutes
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
08-08-2002 Planning Comm. Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2008 12:05:00 PM
Creation date
7/23/2008 11:52:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTUS <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />AUGUST 8, 2002 <br />could be addressed with far more certainty than what we have tonight, and <br />the City owed it to the community to have as much information as <br />possible before acting on the preliminary plat. The Administrator again <br />acknowledged that the developer is making progress, but there is still quite <br />a ways to go on the issues related to Williams Pipeline. The Administrator <br />noted that the developer will Iil<ely have to waive the City's 60-day review <br />period. <br />McDonald requested approval of the preliminary plat contingent upon <br />resolution of any issues related to Williams Pipeline. <br />"I'he Administrator acluiowledged that the City has done contingent <br />preliminary plat approvals in the past. However, given the impact that the <br />Williams Pipeline review could have on this particular plat, he did not <br />reconuroend approval until that review is completed. The City Planner <br />agreed that the result of the Williams Pipeline review could be significant <br />changes to the design of the plat- <br />Keis asked if there were other issues of concern that the Commission <br />should consider aside from those related to the pipeline. <br />David Crary asked about the front yard setback of 20 Peet as shown on the <br />plat or 30 feet as required by the Subdivision Code. McDonald indicated <br />that they will change the front yard setback to 30 feet. <br />Crary indicated that he doubted that a lot of the property was buildable <br />without major corrections, and asked the City to require soil tests. <br />McDonald pointed out that they will have to submit engineering <br />information for each building pad to the City Engineer. <br />Crary felt that the amount of grading that this site will require was <br />tantamount to raping the property. McDonald disagreed. He also noted <br />that a major tree survey will be done, signifcant trees will be preserved, <br />and additional landscaping added. He also noted that the retaining walls <br />have been eliminated, thus reducing the amount of grading from what was <br />initially proposed. <br />Steve Brausen asked about sanitary sewer and water on Preserve Trail as <br />well as future development potential for property abutting Preserve Trail. <br />McDonald noted Chat there is an active sanitary sewer line and water main <br />on ViI<ing Drive and the same will be added on Preserve Court. <br />Therefore, access to these utilities for properties abutting Preserve Trail <br />would be available from either direction. <br />- 12- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.