My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-10-2016 Workshop Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
02-10-2016 Workshop Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2016 3:45:24 PM
Creation date
2/23/2016 3:45:13 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP <br />FEBRUARY 10, 2016 <br />service providers and consultants at least every five years. The City <br />Administrator stated that staff feels that five years is too short of a time <br />period, so this language should be amended. He explained that RFP's are <br />very cumbersome for both staff and the contractor, and the city should be <br />serious when asking for one. He stated that staff can usually tell when <br />costs are getting high and the city should rebid for a service. <br />McGraw suggested an annual review discussion about consultants rather <br />than having a set time period. He noted that these contracts should not sit <br />untouched for too long, but an annual review of pricing is probably <br />enough. The City Administrator stated staff can make a report that shows <br />the annual total that is paid to each consultant for the Council to review. <br />He stated staff would bring the financial policy with the final amendments <br />back to the Council for review. <br />FINANCIAL The City Administrator stated Councilmember Fischer had commented <br />REPORTING that the periodic financial reports the Council receives does not do a good <br />DISCUSSION job of showing them where the city finances are at. Staff agrees, but the <br />problem is that it is very hard to match up revenues with expenditures <br />given the uneven cash flow that a city experiences. He explained that a <br />city's finances do not operate like a business. He stated that the <br />expenditures are typically tracked on a monthly basis, so it is possible to <br />gauge where the city is at over the course of the year. He further <br />explained that revenues do not flow consistently on a month to month <br />basis, or even a quarter to quarter basis. The City Administrator gave <br />examples of the bigger sources of revenue, and when the city receives the <br />payments. Property taxes essentially come to the city in two payments in <br />June and November; Local Government Aid comes in two payments in <br />July and December, license fees are billed annually, and water and sewer <br />revenues are collected quarterly with the larger amounts from summer <br />water usage. The Finance Director stated she has created financial reports <br />to try to show where the city is actually at, and also included information <br />on previous years so the Council can compare year to year to see if things <br />are way off. The City Administrator noted staff does not have a good <br />solution to this issue, but wants to make sure that the Council is receiving <br />all of the information they want. <br />SANITARY The City Administrator stated he is concerned that the minimum sewer <br />SEWER RATE rate ($50) is fairly high in comparison to our sewer rate per 1,000 gallons <br />MODIFICATION of water usage ($3.58), and feels this gap should be narrowed. He stated <br />PHILOSOPY the issue is fielding a balance so any changes don't impact other people too <br />much. He explained the minimum charge currently equates to usage of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.