Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> STAFF REPORT <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />TO: Mayor Keis and Members of City Council <br /> <br />FROM: Joel Hanson, City Administrator <br /> <br />DATE: January 8, 2016 <br /> <br />RE: Parks & Recreation Director Phased Retirement Agreement <br /> <br />The Parks & Recreation Director has proposed a solution to achieve the $30,000 budget reduction in <br />his department’s administrative costs (a copy of his e-mail is attached). His proposal is as follows: <br />• He will work on a full-time basis for the months of January & February in 2016. <br />• He will reduce his hours to ½ time status effective 3/1/16. <br />• He will be fully retired before the end of 2016 (12/31/16). The timing of this decision will be <br />based largely on the Department’s transition planning to assure continued quality service levels <br />and at the Park & Recreation Director’s discretion; subject to budgetary compliance associated <br />with a potential new hire and other benefit payouts. <br />• He would like to enter into a Phase Retirement Option (PRO) through Public Employees <br />Retirement Association that will enable him to collect full retirement benefits upon reduction to <br />½ time status. This agreement will not extend beyond 2016. (A copy of PRO document and <br />related information is attached to this memo.) <br />Staff is also recommending we continue his health insurance benefits on the same basis as if he were <br />on fulltime status for three additional months (through 5/31) in recognition of his cooperation in <br />helping us to resolve this matter. This recommendation has been vetted with the City Attorney who <br />confirmed it is an allowable option even though our Personnel Policy does not allow an employee to <br />garner health insurance benefits unless they are fulltime status. The difference in this case is that we <br />directed the reduction in the department’s budget and staffing that resulted in the reduction from <br />fulltime status. <br />Based on the above scenario, the costs for this option are $57,560 versus the $106,845 originally <br />budgeted (prior to the $30,000 reduction). That difference generates a savings of $49,285. Part of that <br />will be further reduced by the payout of the unused sick leave to the Retirement Health Savings Plan <br />that will amount to about $13,250 leaving us at $36,035. (Note: This payment will be reflected as an <br />expense in the 2016 budget pursuant to Governmental Accounting Standards Board requirements.) <br />The additional savings above $30,000 can help offset payouts of accrued PTO or provide for some <br />staffing overlap for a replacement when hired.