My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-25-2016 Special Mtg - Improvement Hearing
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
05-25-2016 Special Mtg - Improvement Hearing
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/23/2016 4:53:13 PM
Creation date
9/23/2016 4:53:11 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL <br />MAY 25, 2016 <br />that if they have to haul something away, it should be the poor quality <br />soils instead. He stated that a lot of the base under these street is fly ash, <br />which is very frost susceptible. The City Engineer explained that a full <br />reconstruction is what would normally happen, but the costs would be <br />very high because of the condition of the soils. He noted that the proposed <br />improvements do not meet a design standard, but is more cost effective <br />and has worked for the last 25 years. <br />The City Engineer explained that the funding would be determined by the <br />method used for assessments when Ryan Drive was repaired in the early <br />2000's. He stated that the assessment payments can be made in full within <br />the first 30 days after the assessment hearing, which will likely be in <br />October. He reviewed the two proposed options for these streets. The <br />City Administrator clarified that Option 2 was based on a request from the <br />attendees at the neighborhood meeting. <br />Roger Stanke, owner of 209 Ryan Drive, asked if a mat would be used. <br />The City Engineer stated that a geotechnical engineer said a mat would not <br />be beneficial here because of the type of soils and moisture levels. <br />An attendee asked why the Q3 property is not being assessed because they <br />use the street more than anyone else. The City Engineer stated this is the <br />usual cutoff location in this area. The City Administrator stated because <br />of the history of this road, and when Spruce Street gets done, they will be <br />assessed, and they are also being assessed this year for the South Owasso <br />Boulevard improvements. <br />An attendee asked when the work would be done. The City Engineer <br />stated the contractor said he would use the same pricing as already bid, <br />and it needs to be done this year because the street probably will not hold <br />up over another winter. The attendee stated it did not seem like they had a <br />choice. He was surprised by the cost, but agrees that it needs to be done. <br />He stated that he understands why Q3 isn't being assessed for these <br />improvements, but wishes they would be because of how much they use <br />the road. He questioned why the City does not just use part of the taxes <br />that people already pay for street improvements. The City Administrator <br />stated that this assessment policy has been in place for many years to pay <br />for street projects. <br />The City Administrator asked for opinions about the two options. An <br />attendee stated the costs were not much more to do the corrections, so his <br />opinion was to do that. The City Engineer stated if there are really soft or <br />poor spots, they will fix those, otherwise they will correct as far as the <br />material they have will go. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.