My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-28-2016 Council Packet
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
09-28-2016 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2019 10:28:19 AM
Creation date
9/23/2016 5:26:01 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />The applicant also anticipates the subdivision of the parcels containing the two <br />buildings, but there would be access and business interchange between the two sites. <br />The PUD zoning would accommodate this operation and subdivision, allowing some <br />flexibility between setback areas. <br /> <br />The site in question totals 2.62 acres, or about 114,500 square feet. The total proposed <br />building area would be 15,170 square feet. In the I-P District, outdoor storage is <br />allowed to the lesser of 10% of the lot area, or 25% of the building area. In the I-1 <br />District, outdoor storage is allowed to be up to 60% of the rear yard. <br /> <br />For comparison purposes, outdoor storage would potentially be allowed on the parcel <br />as follows, depending on the industrial zoning applied to the site: <br /> <br /> I-P, Industrial Park I-1, Light Industrial Proposed <br />Lot area 11,450 sf 34,000 sf <br />Building size 3,692 sf NA <br />Actual allowance 3,682 sf 34,000 sf 16,420 sf <br /> <br /> <br />Again, the measurement of the outdoor storage area on Lot 1, the existing building site, <br />appears to be much more than the 1,555 square feet listed on the plans. <br /> <br />The proposed layout falls between the applicable I-1 and I-P standards for outdoor <br />storage. Apart from this, the plan appears to meet most of the other I-P District <br />requirements, although final site plan and building details would be necessary to confirm <br />this. <br /> <br />The PUD approach is being sought, since variance requests for total outdoor storage <br />area would not appear to meet the requirements of the ordinance for approval. <br />Variances require a finding that there is some unique condition of the site that creates a <br />practical difficulty, or interferes, with putting the property to a reasonable use. It would <br />clearly be possible to meet the I-P storage requirement, consistent with other <br />surrounding property. <br /> <br />By utilizing PUD zoning, the applicant is seeking City consideration of a use that would <br />not meet ordinance requirements. The City would need to find that the proposed zoning <br />is compatible with existing and future surrounding land uses, and consistent with the <br />intent of the City’s planning goals as identified in the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br /> <br />Summary and Recommendation <br /> <br />As noted, the PUD zoning creates a specific set of unique zoning regulations that would <br />apply only this property. The City would need to find that the approach would be <br />consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and compatible with surrounding land uses. <br /> <br />Because there are issues that need to be verified, the Planning Commission may <br />choose to make Concept Plan comments only, and refer the full subdivision and Final <br />Stage PUD consideration to a future date when the complete data is available.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.