Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />FEBRUARY 22, 2017 <br />PRELIMINARYAND FINAL PLAT REQUEST AT 2736 & 2744 RICE <br />STREET UNTIL THE MARCH 6, 2017 CITY COUNCIL MEETING. <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Montour. <br />Aye (5). <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />CONCEPT PLAN <br />The City Planner gave a background of the project, explaining that the <br />REVIEW OF A <br />applicant is looking to subdivide the large property into 11 single family <br />SINGLE FAMILY <br />lots on a cul-de-sac on the west side of the property. He noted that the <br />RESIDENTIAL <br />subdivision ordinance requires that any other possible development on the <br />DEVELOPMENT <br />site also be shown, even if it is not proposed at the time, and explained <br />AT 3000 LABORE <br />that is the case with the lots shown on the east side. He stated that this <br />ROAD; <br />concept plan review is the first step in discussing the development and the <br />APPLICANT: THE <br />developer's intentions. He noted that there are formal steps required by <br />LINCOLN GROUP <br />ordinance to subdivide and plat the property that would occur after this if <br />there is City Council support for the project. <br />The City Planner explained that the Planning Commission reviewed this <br />and had a significant amount of discussion and many of the neighbors <br />were in attendance. He reported that soil testing has now been done and <br />the applicant has modified the site plan to add more lots to recoup the <br />development and site preparation costs. He explained that the plan in <br />front of the Council tonight was received by Staff two days ago and has <br />not been reviewed in depth. He reported that the developer has gotten <br />more information from soil testing and is now proposing lot widths and <br />side yard setbacks that are less than what the City Code requires, so the <br />Council should decide if they are supportive of this. The City Planner <br />noted that the Council recently amended the Code to require that lots be <br />wider. <br />Dan Lincoln, The Lincoln Group, stated that they originally came forward <br />with a plan for 11 lots that easily met City requirements, but after getting <br />more soil testing results, more lots that are smaller are needed to make this <br />project feasible. He noted that rather than walk away now knowing that <br />the next developer will need to ask for the same thing, they are going to <br />continue and try to make something work. <br />Dave Nash, Alliant Engineering, stated that the site has the typical one to <br />two feet of topsoil, but then has very soft clay underneath so they would <br />need to deal with another six to eight feet to improve the soil quality. He <br />explained that the clay can be removed, dried, put back in and re - <br />compacted in order to make it stable enough for a house, but that adds a <br />lot of cost. He stated that they are asking to deviate from the required lot <br />2 <br />