Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />MARCH 22, 2017 <br />UPDATED <br />The City Planner reviewed the general plan being proposed and reported <br />CONCEPT PLAN <br />that this development has previously been reviewed with 11 lots using R - <br />REVIEW OF A <br />1, Single Family Residential standards. Since then, soil reports have come <br />SINGLE FAMILY <br />back showing issues that will cause higher costs. He explained that the <br />RESIDENTIAL <br />applicant has now submitted a revised concept plan showing 17 lots that <br />DEVELOPMENT <br />are smaller and narrower with setbacks that are less than the Zoning Code <br />AT 3000 LABORS <br />requires. He stated that other than additional lots, the overall site plan is <br />ROAD; <br />still very similar to the original plan. The City Planner stated that the <br />APPLICANT: <br />Council is looking at this as a concept review again in order to provide <br />THE LINCOLN <br />feedback to the applicant. He noted that the Planning Commission <br />GROUP <br />reviewed this updated plan and were concerned about the close spacing <br />between homes, but felt that it was generally a concept they would <br />consider. He pointed out again that the layout shown on the southeast <br />corner of the site plan is only to show additional possible development on <br />the site, and is not being considered for development at this time. <br />Danny Lincoln, The Lincoln Group, stated that there is a big demand for <br />villa style homes and he feels that it would fit in to the neighborhood. <br />Fischer asked what the price point would be. Mr. Lincoln stated they <br />would be $450,000 to $550,000. Keis stated his concern is that the City <br />would be setting precedence by allowing the smaller lots for this <br />development, and then others could come in and want to do that too. <br />Fischer asked why they now need to increase the number of lots to 17. <br />Mr. Lincoln stated that the smaller lots fit the product they are planning <br />for. Keis pointed out .that this proposal is pushing all of the City Code <br />limits; the lots are smaller with reduced setbacks, a longer cul-de-sac, a <br />steep street, a lot of retaining walls, and the homes very close together. <br />Dave Nash, Alliant Engineering, stated that no matter how many lots are <br />here, there will be retaining walls and the slope grade does not change. <br />Chad Baker, realtor with ReMax Realty, representing the Sculley family, <br />explained that the villa homes are a consistent type of product being sold <br />across the metro area for similar prices. He noted that the Sculley <br />property is very challenging to develop, and he has done a lot of market <br />research, and single family homes on these lots will not sell, but high-end, <br />luxury villas that are maintenance free are selling. <br />The City Administrator asked the Planner if it is common for villa <br />developments to have smaller lots because they have a common green <br />space for the residents to share. The Planner stated that it is not <br />uncommon, but often times the open space is just to preserve some natural <br />area. Mr. Baker stated that the natural feature and uniqueness of this <br />property is being preserved, rather than having just a man-made green <br />space. Montour pointed out that only the homes on one side of the street <br />will be able to enjoy the view, and the rest will just look out at a street and <br />4 <br />