Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION <br />April 6, 2017 <br />also visit Pioneer Park to check out space for the wow park and the <br />drinking fountain project from the prioritization list, if time allowed. The <br />Commission agreed. <br /> <br /> The City Administrator reported that P & R/Community Services Manager <br />Shearen had gotten three different proposals for play equipment in <br />Spooner Park based on the $115,000 budgeted dollars. He noted that the <br />standards have changed, but Spooner Park currently has a concrete base <br />and sand, and the sand often washes out in the rain due to the grading of <br />the park, which slopes down. The City Administrator noted that there was <br />a large discrepancy between the costs and play structures from the three <br />quotes. He presented option one by Landscape Structures which included <br />two play areas, one for younger children, and one for older children. He <br />noted there is a large amount of open space, but the structures had to <br />maintain a minimum of six feet of fall space between structures and the <br />curbing. The City Administrator presented option two by Game Time. He <br />noted his seven year old grandson had looked at the proposals and chose <br />this one as his favorite because “there was more stuff going on”. The City <br />Administrator mentioned option two did not use the entire budget. He <br />explained Game Time had a purchasing contract with USC which <br />provided lower pricing on pay equipment. The City Administrator <br />presented a third option which was a taller structure with three sections, <br />and the cost was just under $150,000. <br /> <br /> He noted each option presented good qualities, but he wanted to come up <br />with an engagement process to involve residents. The City Administrator <br />proposed asking the students at Arbor Day for their opinions on the <br />options. He also noted the Little Canada Recreation Association seemed <br />interested in helping out with the project, and there may be additional <br />costs involved to make an ADA accessible path to the equipment. <br />Horwath asked what the timeline was for the project. The City <br />Administrator said the project could be completed as early as Canadian <br />Days, but he wanted to make sure there was enough time to hold an <br />engagement process. The City Administrator explained Game Time had <br />stated they need about a six week lead time on the project. Therefore, if <br />the Commission wanted to have it built by Canadian Days, they would <br />have to choose by early June. He also mentioned Game Time also offered <br />the opportunity to have a “community build”. The City Administrator <br />stated Game Time would provide most of the equipment, but about 50 <br />volunteers would be needed. He noted that the equipment is fairly easy to <br />put together because it locks into place. The City Administrator explained <br />a community build would also lower the project cost by about $15,000. <br /> <br /> Horwath asked if the sod would be ready by Canadian Days, or if the foot <br />traffic would wreck it. The City Administrator noted that the City could <br />tear out the old equipment and it would probably only take one day. He