My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-12-2017 Council Packet
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
07-12-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2019 10:28:07 AM
Creation date
7/13/2017 9:41:31 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />8 <br /> <br /> Housing Link maintains a website to assist people in finding apartments where vouchers <br />are accepted. Their research manager, Dan Hylton, recommends cities give rental licensees <br />information about Housing Link and urge them to list there if their units are affordable. <br /> <br />Minnesota Challenge <br /> <br />A particularly helpful study of practical things that can be done to increase the <br />willingness of local governments to build affordable housing is the Minnesota Challenge study <br />conducted in 2014. The goal is to give state and local communities additional options for <br />providing a full range of housing choices for low and moderate income residents. The study was <br />conducted by CURA, the Housing Justice Center and Becker Consulting and funded by <br />Minnesota Housing, the McKnight Foundation, ULI Minnesota and Enterprise Community <br />Partners. <br /> <br /> The most important lesson from the research is that local policies that affect cost play an <br />important role in determining whether it is feasible to build affordable housing and in the amount <br />of affordable housing that can be built throughout the region. <br /> <br /> The report identifies eleven areas where improvements can be made, such as: <br />● Supporting appropriate density. The single area with the largest impact on cost is the <br />failure of cities to support cost-effective density and scale of affordable housing projects. <br />Several cities have been successful in resisting this tendency. <br />● Finding and acquiring sites for new developments is one of the most difficult, time <br />consuming and expensive tasks developers undertake. A number of cities have been quite <br />proactive in easing these burdens, from identifying appropriate sites to zoning sufficient <br />land. <br />● Fee reductions and waivers. Local fees, which vary widely, can easily add $20,000 to <br />$30,000 in costs per unit. <br />● Supporting inclusionary housing, where market rate units must include a certain ratio of <br />affordable units. <br /> <br />Hope for the Future <br /> <br /> Despite the complex challenges listed in this report, we are guardedly hopeful for the <br />future. The Greater Minnesota Housing Fund, a nonprofit affordable housing lender, is <br />developing the nation’s first regional pool of money to help affordable housing stay that way. <br />The Fund will assist buyers who want to buy apartment complexes when they come up for sale <br />in the seven-county metropolitan area. The goal is to purchase 10 to 20 percent of the affordable <br />housing buildings that go on the market. <br /> In our area, Aeon, a Twin Cities non-profit organization, recently purchased a pair of <br />apartment buildings that will provide much needed workforce housing. The first, Goldenstar, is <br />a 109-unit building in Maplewood. The other, Sun Place, is a 30-unit structure in Roseville. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.