My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-10-2002 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
04-10-2002 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 1:06:40 PM
Creation date
7/23/2008 2:07:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ro11NUTI:s <br />C:1"I'Y COUNCIL, <br />APRIL 10, 2002 <br />RGCI;SS <br />VODCF3ERS <br />CALL FO R <br />VACATION <br />HirARING - <br />COAIMON <br />fIOND <br />City abutting pipelines, and adopting such a setback would make these <br />properties non-conforming. <br />Tom I-lartigan asked if this property would be considered a wetland <br />preservation area under the tax code. The City Attorney reported that his <br />research shows that there has never been a conservation delineation of this <br />property. Therefore, the property would not be considered a wetland <br />preservation area. <br />Hartigan suggested that if the City were to acquire the property according to <br />MN Code 273.1 1 Subd. 1 1 the value of the property should be assessed at the <br />wetland value. The City Attorney replied that acquisition of prope~Yy by a <br />State agency has to be at fair market value. While the property has enjoyed <br />tax-exempt status for several years, the County is reassessing the property and <br />changing the status to taxable at the request of the property owner. The <br />County is also looking to collect back taxes on the property. The City <br />Attorney reported that while the City is obligated to pay fair market value For <br />the property, if the property is acquired through eminent domain, that value <br />will likely be determined by acourt-appointed board of commissioners or by a <br />Ju~'Y <br />)illy Lomark appeared before the Council and presented Barbara Allen and <br />Tom Hartigan with tokens of appreciation for the work they have done on this <br />issue on behalf of the neighborhood. <br />At this point in the meeting 9:00 p.m., Council took a short recess. The <br />meeting was reconvened at 9:10 p.m. <br />Mr. LaValle introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOL(ITIONNO. 2002-4-8/-APPRDUINGTHE vOUCHER.S <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Scalze. <br />Ayes (5) LaValle, Scalze, Fahey, Montour, Anderson. <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />Mrs. Scalze introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOI. (ITION NO. 2002-4-82 -CALLING FOR A VACATION HEAIUNG <br />TO CONSIDER THE vACATIONOFSANITARl'.SEWER EA.S~EMENT <br />FOR WEDNESDAY, MAY 22, 2002, AT 7:30 P. M. IN IT RELATES TO <br />COMMON 130ND'.S ADD/T /ON TO TI/E GARDEN TERRACE <br />APART MF.NT.S~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.