My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-07-2017 Parks & Rec Commission Workshop Minutes
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
09-07-2017 Parks & Rec Commission Workshop Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2019 9:21:50 AM
Creation date
9/28/2017 2:48:35 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
be a high priority and acquiring new park land and natural areas was a low <br />priority. Springer stated they had also received feedback for the proposed Wow <br />Factor Park in Pioneer. She explained water play and winter activities scored <br />well. Springer also showed the results from the wagon boards which had the <br />phrase “In my park I’d like to have”. She summarized the comments which <br />included a dog park, water feature, seating options, and multipurpose courts. <br />Kost noted that since the dog park had just opened, many people may not yet <br />have been aware. <br /> <br />Springer discussed the online survey results with the Commission. She noted <br />the survey had 207 participants with a 70 percent completion rate. Springer <br />stated that under operation and maintenance almost all categories ranked <br />“good”. She commented there was a large percentage of respondents that ranked <br />signage and information as “fair”. Springer stated security had received mixed <br />responses, and 10 percent ranked security as poor. Ray wondered if the <br />responses had been influenced by recent events. Schletty noted it could have to <br />do with many of the trails being very secluded. Councilman Fischer stated it <br />wasn’t a surprising response since trail lighting and cameras were a high <br />priority. Kost stated the majority of categories including mowing, trash removal, <br />parking, green infrastructure all ranked “good” which was a positive indicator. <br /> <br />Springer stated 55% of respondents wanted to see a connection to the Gateway <br />Trail when asked which trail connections should be made in the City. She noted <br />respondents could choose more than one answer. <br /> <br />When asked which priorities the City should focus on in the future, Springer <br />explained the top 10 responses out of 51 included hiking, trails, trail lighting, <br />senior programming, playground, benches, educational classes, a dog park, and <br />an indoor pool. <br /> <br />Springer stated the question on whether various streets’ paved shoulders were <br />acceptable for pedestrians showed that Keller Parkway was the most <br />unacceptable shoulder and Edgerton was the next most unacceptable shoulder. <br />She noted the answers between unacceptable and acceptable for both Edgerton <br />and Keller were pretty evenly split and the same question for bicyclists showed <br />the shoulders were more acceptable than for pedestrians. When asked if there <br />were safe and convenient walking routes throughout the City, Springer stated, <br />55% of respondents indicated there were not. The same question for bicyclists <br />received the same answer. Horwath noted Edgerton Street was recently widened <br />to create a dedicated bike lane, but it still was very busy. He understood why <br />people saw it as unsafe. <br /> <br />Springer discussed the response to the question asking if Little Canada should <br />create a wow park to show off the community and draw people to our city. She <br />stated 55% of people said no, the City should not create a wow park. The City <br />Administrator stated the question should have been worded differently to read
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.