10-11-2017 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

[97259/1] 3 to local franchising authorities.4 During the negotiations between the parties in this case, however, NSCC sought a higher level of complimentary services for its member- cities. Specifically, it sought complimentary cable service provided to more than three locations within each city.5 The parties ultimately settled upon a two-part solution to their disagreement. Section 2.10 of the Franchise Agreement would reflect the familiar offering made by Comcast to a host community in the Twin Cities – specifically, Comcast agreed “to provide Digital Starter or equivalent package of Cable Service and reception equipment to up to three (3) outlets at all municipal government buildings, schools and public libraries located in the City where Grantee provides Cable Service.”6 Yet, in a “Side Letter” to be completed by Comcast and each NSCC member city, Comcast would further agree to provide complimentary cable service to four additional “outlets at the Commission Office and at each City Hall of each Member City.”7 As the Side Letter explains: “These items have been negotiated in good faith and agreed to as part of the informal franchise renewal process pursuant to 47 U.S.C. [§] 546(h)(2012), and specifically relate to unique community needs that exist in the City.”8 Beginning in December of 2016, counsel for each of the parties exchanged drafts of the Side Letter and the lawyers for each side proposed revisions and additions for the other party to consider.9 The NSCC negotiator maintains that as part of the discussions and deliberations over various drafts, he made clear to Comcast’s negotiator that a key purpose of the Side Letter for the NSCC and its member-cities was to “eliminate any additional charges” related to High Definition television services and equipment.10 The complimentary services delivered to the NSCC and its member cities under the then- current agreement, which was initially approved in 2002, included only Standard Definition programming.11 Under Comcast’s rate structure in late 2016, as it is today, the delivery of High Definition cable television services is separately-priced and is more costly than Standard Definition cable television service.12 Comcast obtains an additional $10 per subscription month for providing High Definition television service to its customers.13 While both High Definition television and Standard Definition television are digital services, as the monikers suggest, High Definition television services provides viewers 4 Holmes Decl., at 2. 5 Id; Bradley Aff., at 2. 6 Id; Bradley Aff., Attach. A, at 10. 7 Bradley Aff., Attach. D. 8 Id. 9 See Holmes Decl., at 2-4; Bradley Aff., at 1-3. 10 Bradley Aff., at 2. 11 See Comcast’s Memorandum of Law in Support of its Motion for a Sufficient Notice of Hearing, at 4 (September 19, 2014); Digital Recording (August 14, 2017). 12 See Holmes Decl., Attach. 4. 13 Id.