My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-28-2018 Planning Commission Packet
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
03-28-2018 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2019 9:22:27 AM
Creation date
4/5/2018 4:59:11 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
percent of the cost of constructing a new structure of the same square footage and type on the <br />site. The municipality may find that a building is not disqualified as structurally substandard <br />under the preceding sentence on the basis of reasonably available evidence, such as the size, <br />type, and age of the building, the average cost of plumbing, electrical, or structural repairs or <br />other similar reliable evidence. The municipality may not make such a determination without <br />an interior inspection of the property, but need not have an independent, expert appraisal <br />prepared of the cost of repair and rehabilitation of the building. An interior inspection of the <br />property is not required, if the municipality finds that (1) the municipality or authority is unable <br />to gain access to the property after using its best efforts to obtain permission from the party that <br />owns or controls the property; and (2) the evidence otherwise supports a reasonable conclusion <br />that the building is structurally substandard. <br />(d) A parcel is deemed to be occupied by a structurally substandard building for purposes of the <br />finding under paragraph (a) or by the improvement described in paragraph (e) if all of the <br />following conditions are met: <br />(1) the parcel was occupied by a substandard building or met the requirements of paragraph <br />(e), as the case may be, within three years of the filing of the request for certification of the <br />parcel as part of the district with the county auditor; <br />(2) the substandard building or the improvements described in paragraph (e) were demolished <br />or removed by the authority or the demolition or removal was financed by the authority or <br />was done by a developer under a development agreement with the authority; <br />(3) the authority found by resolution before the demolition or removal that the parcel was <br />occupied by a structurally substandard building or met the requirement of paragraph (e) and <br />that after demolition and clearance the authority intended to include the parcel within a <br />district; and <br />(4) upon filing the request for certification of the tax capacity of the parcel as part of a district, <br />the authority notifies the county auditor that the original tax capacity of the parcel must be <br />adjusted as provided by § 469.177, subdivision 1, paragraph (f). <br />(e) For purposes of this subdivision, a parcel is not occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved <br />or gravel parking lots or other similar structures unless 15 percent of the area of the parcel <br />contains buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots or other similar structures. <br />(f) For districts consisting of two or more noncontiguous areas, each area must qualify as a <br />redevelopment district under paragraph (a) to be included in the district, and the entire area of <br />the district must satisfy paragraph (a). <br />In meeting the statutory criteria the City relies on the following facts and findings: <br />• The District is a redevelopment district consisting two, noncontiguous areas of nine parcels. <br />• An inventory shows that parcels consisting of more than 70 percent of the area in each area in the District <br />are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots or other similar structures. <br />• An inspection of the buildings located within each area of the District finds that more than 50 percent of <br />the buildings are structurally substandard as defined in the TIF Act. (See Appendix F). <br />City of Little Canada <br />Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 7-1 1-3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.