Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />AUGUST 28, 2002 <br />Fahey stated that he was very safety conscience pointing out his service on <br />the Fire Department as well as the fact that he works for a gas utility. <br />Fahey noted that gas utility lines exist right in the streets in front of al] the <br />homes in Little Canada. These lines can be dangerous as well, yet there is <br />not discussion for an increased setback from these lines, only for the <br />Williams Pipeline. Fahey noted that the issue for the Council is trying to <br />be fair and reasonable to all the parties concerned. <br />Allen noted that safety is the neighborhood's concern, and he noted that <br />some individuals present have experienced ruptured pipelines. <br />Fahey felt that the Council needed additional information. First, <br />information is needed on the location of the pipelines as well as the <br />easement, and the relative distance from the pipelines to the proposed <br />structures. Fahey stated that he would also like information about setback <br />standards that other cities have adopted. Fahey indicated that the Council <br />needs to be convinced that whatever standard is adopted is reasonable and <br />desirable. Fahey stated that he was not interested in adopting a standard <br />the sole purpose of which is to preclude development. <br />Scalze stated that she would like to see where the pipeline runs through <br />the entire City to review the impact of the pipeline on both developed and <br />undeveloped properties. <br />Fahey also stated that he would like the opinion of the City Attorney as <br />relates to the liability that the City incurs if it adopts a setback that is <br />significantly different from what other cities have adopted. <br />Anderson asked if the recommended setback would be different depending <br />on The depth of the pipeline. Weiss replied that depth is not a factor. <br />Steve Brausen asked how much gasoline would flow from the pipeline if a <br />major rupture occurred. Weiss indicated that Williams monitors the lines, <br />and if a rupture occurred, the pipeline would be shut down immediately. <br />However, he estimated that as much as 50,000 gallons of gasoline could <br />leak before the pipeline could be shut down. That would be the equivalent <br />of 7 tankers. <br />Fahey agreed that a rupture is a major public safety risk. However, if it is <br />assumed that a rupture is a certainty, no one would build next to a <br />pipeline. <br />Fahey also asked for information on the cathodic protection that is in place <br />for the lines, the type of maintenance performed on the lines, information <br />on the integrity of the lines, and any other information on safety issues. <br />12 <br />