Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />AUGUST 28, 2002 <br />Scalze asked if a 50-year old pipeline would be inclined to have more <br />problems than a 2-year old pipeline. Ron Wiest, Chief Engineer, Office of <br />Pipeline Safety, reviewed manufacturing standards for the steel pipes used <br />in pipelines, which he indicated were good. He pointed out, however, that <br />it is not possible to test every inch of the pipe. Wiest also reported that <br />when pipelines were first installed, it was through undeveloped areas. <br />However, development is encroaching on pipelines. Wiest also noted that <br />studies have indicated that hospitals, schools, public buildings, and <br />organized sports should not be constructed close to pipelines. Wiest also <br />reported that when setback standards were reviewed at the State level, the <br />State left the issue to communities because the State did not have the right <br />to take land. <br />Fahey asked if the Office of Pipeline Safety feels that the ordinance <br />adopted by Maplewood was a reasonable one. Wiest reported that while <br />they did not give their blessing to the 100 foot standard, the Office of <br />Pipeline Safety was glad that the 100 foot setback was adopted. <br />Fahey noted that if the City adopts an ordinance that is unreasonably <br />restrictive, and it makes property undevelopable, it is likely to be <br />considered a taking. Fahey noted that in matters of public policy, Little <br />Canada typically looks at what other cities are doing and what appears to <br />be reasonable. Fahey noted that the only information on pipeline setback <br />standards that other cities have adopted is the Maplewood standard at 100 <br />feet. <br />Kenow indicated that his Office would be happy to research what other <br />communities have done and report that information to the Council. <br />Glen Hageman commented that as more information is learned about this <br />issue, he felt that the City should take action and adopt a pipeline setback <br />ordinance. He also urged the City to look at other parcels within Little <br />Canada that abut pipelines. Hageman felt it was important that the <br />Council work to protect the safety of the entire community. <br />Crary urged the Council to make Little Canada a leader in this issue rather <br />than a follower. <br />Dr. Allen, McMenemy Road, indicated that the neighborhood is not <br />asking specifically fora 150-foot setback standard, but a standard that <br />addressed public safety. Allen felt that public safety was more important <br />than development. <br />11 <br />