My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-25-2002 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
09-25-2002 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 1:09:30 PM
Creation date
7/23/2008 2:17:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COIINCIL <br />SEPTEMBER 25, 2002 <br />provided by City staff shows there are 31 properties that have structures <br />within 50 feet of the edge of a pipeline easement. Fahey felt that the 50- <br />foot policy creates a hazard zone in the City, and he did not feel there was <br />solid evidence to support the creation of that zone. Fahey noted the State <br />regulation for no construction of structures on pipeline easements, and that <br />coupled with keeping the road off the easement area would create the <br />buffer that is being sought without impacting those other 31 properties in <br />the City. <br />Scalze noted that the Williams Pipeline is a 45-year-old line that has had <br />three undisturbed breaks. Given this information, Scalze felt that adoption <br />of a setback policy was warranted. <br />Fahey noted that the Office of Pipeline Safety is recommending a 150-foot <br />setback from pipelines given that their research shows that 2/3rds of the <br />damage from a rupture happens within the 150 feet. The other 1/3rd <br />occurs within 500 feet. Fahey indicated that adoption of that standard <br />would totally preclude development, and noted that cities, other than <br />Maplewood, have not adopted setback standards over the State Statute. <br />Fahey felt that if there was the need for additional setbacks than the <br />easement area itself, then the State should adopt those standards. <br />Ron Wiest, Chief Engineer, Office of Pipeline Safety, agreed that it was <br />the recommendation of his office that a 150-foot setback be adopted from <br />pipelines as outlined in their model ordinance. Fahey noted that this <br />model ordinance was presented to the State Legislature and was not <br />adopted. The State Statute says no development of structures within a <br />pipeline easement area. <br />Allen pointed out that the area involved in The Preserve plat is unique <br />given the wetland. She pointed out that a rupture of the pipeline in this <br />area will impact the adjacent wetland as well as could carry petroleum <br />products through the chain of lakes system. Allen felt, therefore, that <br />additional buffer was warranted in this a~~ea. <br />David Crary pointed out that the Office of Pipeline Safety are the experts <br />and they are recommending the 150-foot setback. Crary felt this was a life <br />safety issue and urged the Council to be leaders on this issue. <br />Tom Hartigan felt that the City needed an ordinance that establishes a <br />reasonable setback from the pipeline. He also noted the impact that a road <br />connection through to Viking Drive will have on the Arcand and Brausen <br />properties. Hartigan felt that The Preserve plat crammed 17 homes into a <br />narrow area. He urged the Council to not ignore the safety issue. <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.