Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />SEPTEMBER 2.5, 2002 <br />Fahey disagreed that the homes were crammed into the area noting that lot <br />sizes range from 14,000 to 15,000 square feet while the City's minimum <br />lot size was 10,000 square feet. <br />Hartigan felt a reduction in the number of lots was justified given the <br />wetland and safety issues. He also felt that the Arcand and Brausen <br />properties would be victimized as a result of a road connection to Viking <br />Drive. <br />Tom Kelly, Viking Drive, reported that the soil may still be tainted in this <br />area due to the last pipeline leak. Kelly indicated that he needs some <br />reassurance from the City that this area will be developed in a safe <br />manner. Kelly indicated that his goal was not to stop development. Kelly <br />stated that he was scared and needed assurances from the City that the area <br />was safe. <br />Fahey noted that the State Legislature has said that a safe standards is that <br />there is no construction of structures within a pipeline right-of--way. <br />Mrs. Kelly appeared before the Council and indicated that initially her <br />focus was on stopping construction. However, that focus has changed to <br />one of public safety. Kelly indicated that she did not feel that Williams <br />Pipeline had any concern for the neighborhood. Kelly asked that the <br />Council focus on public safety. <br />Fahey noted that the City cannot change the location of the pipeline, the <br />City can only regulate development adjacent to pipeline areas. Fahey <br />pointed out that precluding development in this area will not impact the <br />Kelly's sense of safety. The pipeline cannot be moved. Fahey noted that <br />property owners and the City have to rely on Williams to inspect and <br />maintain the line. Fahey noted that the State of Minnesota has determined <br />that there shall be no construction of buildings within a pipeline easement. <br />Fahey felt that the City would be hard-pressed to require more than that <br />standard. He also noted that the City has not even gotten to the point of <br />discussing with the developer the issues of grading and berming that could <br />minimize the impact of a leak should one occur. Fahey stated that he has <br />heard the safety concerns expressed by the neighborhood. He agrees that <br />the City should take steps to minimize these concerns, but noted that the <br />City also has to balance the rights of the property owner/developer. <br />Tom Hartigan noted that the Office of Pipeline Safety is recommending a <br />150-foot setback. Fahey pointed out that the State of Minnesota has the <br />legal authority to adopt this recommendation and has not. The State has <br />said no development of structures within the easement area. Fahey did not <br />feel there was enough evidence to support the adoption of a stricter <br />13 <br />