My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-25-2002 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
09-25-2002 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 1:09:30 PM
Creation date
7/23/2008 2:17:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />SEPTEMBER 25, 2002 <br />about working within this standard. Pipeline safety issues would be a <br />consideration on a case-by-case basis as development proposals are <br />proposed. Anderson felt that the same conclusion could be achieved <br />without the need to adopt a policy that would impact other properties in <br />the City. <br />LaValle asked about the proposed street connection to Viking Drive. <br />Scalze noted the development moratorium on the Palmen property. <br />Fahey stated that he was not in favor of adopting a setback policy as it will <br />raise concerns for other property owners in the City. Fahey felt it was <br />reasonable to live within the State's standard of no development within the <br />easement area. Fahey asked why the City would want to tell other <br />property owners that they have a potential safety hazard. <br />Scalze noted that the City adopts or changes policies all the time based on <br />a net set of knowledge. She further noted that a policy is a guideline and <br />not a law. LaValle further noted that the policy would be applied to new <br />construction and not existing homes. <br />Fahey pointed out the City Attorney's concern about enforcement of a <br />policy. Fahey felt that if the Council feels there should be a 50-foot <br />setback from the edge of an easement, then it should be in ordinance form, <br />not policy form. <br />Mrs. Scalze introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOL UTION NO. 2002-9-217 -CALLING FOR A PURL IC <br />HEARING FOR WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 9, 2002 AT 7:30 P.M. <br />RELATIVE TO CONSIDERATION OF A POL ICY ESTABLISHING A <br />.SO-FOOT SETBACK FROM THE EDGE OF PIPELINE <br />EASEMENTS FOR NEW SU73DIVISIONS, WITH NOTICE <br />PROVII)EI) TO THE OWNERS OF THE PAI_MEN PROPERTY, THE <br />MACKIN PROPERTY, AND THE HEINEL PROPERTY D UE TO <br />THE POLICY'S POTENTIAL. IMPACT <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by LaValle. <br />Ayes (4) Scalze, LaValle, Anderson, Montour. <br />Nays (1 ). Fahey. <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />Mr. Fahey introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RE.S'OLUTIONNO. 2002-9-2I8 -ADVISING DAYSPRING <br />DEVEI OPMENT THAT AS PART OF CONSIDERATION OF THE <br />16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.