My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-19-2018 Council Packet
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
12-19-2018 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2019 10:27:56 AM
Creation date
1/10/2019 10:26:20 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the rain gardens cannot take on all of the water. But the rain gardens are necessary for <br />treatment of storm water as mandated by the MPCA and the Watershed District. <br /> <br /> It was asked if there were any discussion of just doing an overlay over the existing street. <br />Mr. Elfering replied that an overlay has not been considered as the existing cracks in the <br />street would reflect through the new overlay within a year. It would not be a good use of <br />taxpayer dollars to just do an overlay. <br /> <br /> A resident asked what numbers the City Council has when they are looking at a potential <br />project. Mr. Elfering explained that the project is already at the maximum capped <br />assessment rate so that will not change even if the project cost is higher than the <br />estimate. <br /> <br /> A resident questioned the use of a unit assessment on the street as it added 30 feet to <br />their lot. Mr. Elfering stated that a unit assessment treats all properties the same since, in <br />theory, they all use the road about equally. He further stated that the City has been using <br />the unit assessment method for the past six or more years. <br /> <br /> A resident asked if there is any data that shows that the project would increase property <br />values. Mr. Elfering answered that the property value increases by the assessment value <br />or more. There was some discussion of this issue between some of the property owners <br />and Mr. Elfering with one resident claiming that her property would be decreasing in <br />value since two large trees would be lost as part of the project. Mr. Elfering stated that <br />he did not know if the trees would need to be removed yet or not as he had not started <br />design of the project. <br /> <br /> At this point a resident stated that the proposed project needed to be presented to the City <br />Council as they are the decision makers. He added that Mr. Elfering is simply presenting <br />the policies and the potential project and nothing has been decided yet. <br /> <br /> A resident asked if the City does chip sealing projects anymore. Mr. Elfering answered <br />that the City stopped chip sealing two years ago and at this time has no plans to start <br />back up. It has been decided that it is a better use of taxpayer money to do mill and <br />overlays and there have been delaminating issues with past chip seals. Many cities in the <br />area have discontinued the practice. <br /> <br /> A resident asked if chip sealing can be effective on Greenbrier Street. Mr. Elfering <br />responded that chip sealing would not be effective as it would not solve the drainage <br />problems on the street. <br /> <br /> A resident asked if the assessment can be negotiated since the City neglected <br />maintenance of Greenbrier. Mr. Elfering responded that the City has done about the <br />same amount of maintenance on Greenbrier as it has on other streets and when those <br />other streets were reconstructed those residents paid the full assessment. He further <br />stated that the current Greenbrier street has lasted over 50 years and the typical street <br />only lasts 20-25 years so we have gotten more than enough life out of the street.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.