My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-09-2019 Planning Commission Packet
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
05-09-2019 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2019 12:49:19 PM
Creation date
5/9/2019 12:04:40 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The subject parcel is zoned R-1, Single-Family Residential within the Shoreland District overlay. The <br />property is surrounded by properties with the same zoning. The applicant has indicated that <br />construction of a new single-family residential structure will occur on both parcels. The intended use <br />of the property complies with this district. The applicant has no definite/confirmed plans for the two <br />new lots. However, it would be staff’s recommendation that approval of the lot split would be subject <br />to any future plans for these lots to be in compliance with R-1 standards for setback requirements at the <br />time of construction. Below are the code requirements for setbacks within the R-1 District: <br />Setback Requirement <br />Front Yard Not less than 30 feet <br />Side Yard 7 ½ feet <br />Rear Yard Not less than 30 feet <br />City code defines Lot Frontage as “the front of a lot shall be, for purposes of complying with this <br />Ordinance, that boundary abutting a public right-of-way having the least width”. Therefore, as <br />presented the front yard for both of the newly created lots would be Labore Road. The rear yard for <br />both is Keller Parkway. <br />Site Plan Analysis <br />It is necessary to preface to the Commission that city staff has reviewed with Mr. Yargici a multitude <br />of concept plans over the past year. The former City Engineer, Lee Elfering, has walked the property <br />on a number of occasions with Mr. Yargici to discuss feasibility. The concept plans that have been <br />considered ranged from a Subdivision to create six or seven lots to then several revisions of a Simple <br />Subdivision where they’d be seeking three lots or less. In staff’s review of the site it is our <br />determination that the site is conducive to subdividing. The overall lot width and lot area have the <br />potential to create an additional lot or lots. The consideration that needs to be given in your review of <br />this application is will this variance request alter the essential character of the area and is the proposal <br />within the intent of the ordinance. That consideration should create the highest and best use of the site <br />within a reasonable manner being cognizant of the existing grades and proximity to Lake Gervais. <br />As mentioned above, the lot at 675 Keller Parkway as it exists today was the result of a lot <br />combination that occurred in 2006. This property was formerly two lots – 640 Labore Road and 675 <br />Keller Parkway. The owner at the time, Patricia O’Neill, owned both parcels. Her reason for <br />combining the lots was to allow for construction of a sports court on the property at 640 Labore Road. <br />The house and garage formerly on the site were demolished. In 2006, the property at 640 Labore Road <br />was considered a legal non-conforming lot of record due to the fact it only had 34.80 feet of street <br />frontage. The city code at that time also required 75 feet. As part of the City Council resolution for <br />the lot combination a condition was included that stated “any future request for the resubdivision of <br />this property will require that access for the new lot come from Keller Parkway and that the Labore <br />Road access cannot be reestablished”. Mr. Yargici is forthcoming that he was aware of this condition <br />when he purchased the property. That condition is another indicator that there is an understanding that <br />this lot has the potential to be subdivided. <br />The site plan submitted by Mr. Yargici is a concept plan rather than the final certificate of survey that <br />will be required for submission to Ramsey County. In fact, per discussions with Mr. Yargici these lots <br />will have lake access equal to the lot frontage along Keller Parkway which is not reflect on the site <br />plans submitted. However, the applicant did want to proceed with review as submitted.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.