Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />APRIL 11, 2001 <br />HISTORICAL John Ehrnreiter of the Historical Society appeared before the Council and <br />SOCIETY presented the City with a $10,000 check toward the repayment of the loan for <br />the Historical Society Addition. The Council thanked the Historical Society <br />for their hard work and diligent efforts in repaying the cost of the Historical <br />Society Addition. <br />John Ehrnreiter announced that the Historical Society will be holding a <br />spaghetti dinner on Monday, April 23, 2001 from 5 to 7 p.m, at the Venetian <br />Inn. Proceeds from the dinner will be used towazd further repayment of the <br />loan for the Historical Society Addition. <br />LIQUOR Council reviewed the recommendation of City staff' for increases in the <br />LICENSE On-Sale Wine License fee from $300 per year to $400, On-Sale <br />FEES Intoxicating License from $2,750 to $3,000, and On-Sale 3.2 Intoxicating <br />License from $100 to $150. <br />LaValle suggested that the City consider a credit in liquor license fees for those <br />liquor establishments that provide employee training relative to the serving of <br />alcohol. LaValle noted that this would be an incentive for liquor <br />establishments to provide this training, and also pointed out that insurance <br />companies offer a credit on liquor liability insurance for those establishments <br />that require employees to complete this training. <br />Anderson asked about the cost analysis that staff prepared relative to the on- <br />sale liquor establishments. The City Administrator reviewed this cost analysis <br />pointing out that he looked at the property taxes generated by various on-sale <br />liquor establishments as well as some selected businesses in the City, and <br />compared that with the cost for low enforcement services. He noted that, on <br />average, the on-sale liquor businesses required more law enforcement services; <br />and, therefore, had a greater impact on the City's budget. He also noted that he <br />did not offset the cost to the City by liquor license fees, nor did he factor in any <br />costs associated with prosecution ofliquor-related crimes. <br />Anderson noted the results of the 1999 liquor license survey show that the <br />City's liquor license fees are extremely low compared with surrounding cities. <br />Anderson felt that the On-Sale Wine license fee should be at least $1,000 per <br />year, and that the City should set up a graduated fee schedule for the On-Sale <br />Liquor license that includes an incentive for training. <br />Montour pointed out that current fees are not covering the City's costs, <br />especially when prosecution costs are factored in. Montour also agreed that an <br />incentive for training was a good idea. <br />