05-23-01 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

1VIINUTES CITY COUNCIL MAY 23, 2001 Biagini reported that if the building isoffice/warehouse, the western parking could be eliminated. However, if the building is leased by State Farm and is predominantly office space, the parking will be needed. Biagini reported that he discussed the bean situation with Jack Bougie and his preference is that the wood chips be removed, poly put down to prevent weed growth, and wood chips reinstalled. Bougie did not want to see the berm flattened out. Anderson asked if Biagini was agreeable to the installation of additional handicapped parking including van accessible parking. Biagini reported that he was. M,r. LaValle introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOI. UTION NO. 2001-5-IIO - APPROVING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT ALLOWING CONSTRUCTION OP' A I3, 770 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE/WARE HOUSE BUILDING FOR 2935 COUNTRY DRIVE AS PROPOSED 73Y DICK 737AGINI SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF' TIIE PI ANNING COMMISSION, CITY PLANNER, AND CITY ENGINEER, AS WELI. AS APPROVING AZTERNATE BU77 DING PLANS SHOULD STATE FARM LEASE THF. BUILDING AS DESCRIBED BY MR BIAGINI, SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF THESE ALTERNATE PLANS BY THE CITY PLANNER, BUILDING OFFICIA7., AND CITYADMINbSTRATOR The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Scalze. Ayes (5) LaValle, Scalze, Montour, Anderson, Fahey. Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. PUBLIC Fahey opened the Public Hearing to consider an application for Variance HEARING - from the Zoning Code requirement of a 10 foot minimum side yard VARIANCE - setback allowing a new garage with a 5-foot setback at 2535 Stark Street 2535 STARK as requested by Tsgeroman Abraham. The Plam~ing Commission had STREET - recommended approval on a 4 to 2 vote. The City Planner also recommended ABRAHAM approval. Fahey noted that a similar variance request was made for this property in '1986, and that request was denied given there was uo hardship present. Fahey stated that he did not see where circumstances have changed, and felt there was no hardship in this current request. He felt the request was that the property owner wanted to build a garage that was too large for the available space.