My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-22-01 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
08-22-01 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2009 2:41:55 PM
Creation date
8/6/2008 9:32:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />C[TY COUNCIL <br />AUGUST 22, 2001 <br />Cindy Mentes, 3058 Greenbrier Street, reported that prior to purchasing the <br />property they researched the potential for construction of a large accessory <br />garage. They discussed the matter with the Building Official and were <br />informed that while they would need to go through the Conditional Use Permit <br />process, it should not be a problem given the size of their property. Mentes <br />reported that they have two vehicles, a classic car, and a boat and they would <br />]il<e to get these things stored inside. <br />Fahey noted that the Planning Commission did recommend approval of the <br />CUP, however, they recommended that the total accessory garage space be <br />decreased to 1,000 square feet and the space be either added onto the existing <br />gu~age or a detached garage be placed six feet behind the existing garage. <br />Mentes reported That she prepared an amended proposal that was in Keeping <br />with the recommendation of the Planning Commission, and she submitted that <br />proposal to the Council for their review. She indicated, however, that they <br />would like to pursue their original proposal and again pointed out the <br />information she received prior to purchasing the property that what they would <br />like to do would not be a problem. <br />Scalze asked if the proposal submitted this evening should be reviewed by the <br />Planning Commission. The City Planner indicated that in reviewing the new <br />proposal he finds it to be in line with the recommendation That the Planning <br />Commission made. Therefore, it should not be necessary for the Commission <br />to review it. The new proposal shows a 22-foot by 25 foot garage located 6 <br />feet behind the existing garage. Total square footage of the existing garage, <br />minus the foyer area, and the new garage would be 990 square feet. <br />Fahey asked about access to the new garage. The City Planner noted that the <br />existing garage is located 29 feet from the property line. The new garage could <br />be placed at the 10-foot setback line, resulting in an offset that would allow for <br />a blacktop drive alongside the existing garage and into the new garage. There <br />would only be about 3 feet of the new garage that would be located behind the <br />existing garage. <br />Mentes again stated that they would like to pursue their original proposal given <br />the fact that they purchased this property relying on information that was <br />provided to them that their plans for an accessory garage would not be a <br />problem given their lot size. Mentes noted that the Building Offcial even <br />helped them to calculate the struts for the garage that they were proposing. <br />Scalze asked for clarification on the size of the existing garage. Fahey noted <br />that the existing garage is 20 feet by 24 feet, minus 40 feet for the foyer area <br />that extends into the garage for a total of 440 square feet. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.