Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />Ci,TY COUNCIL <br />AUGUST 22, 2001 <br />Ea7STING GARAGE WITII A l2 FOOT SIDEYARD SETBACK, WITH <br />THE STIPULATION THAT THERE**' BE NO BUSINESS USE OF THE <br />GARAGE AND PROPERTY, THAT NO HOIST IS INSTALLED IN THE <br />GARAGE, THAT THERE BE NO MAINTENANCE OF OR WORK ON <br />NON-OWNED VEHICLES ON THE PROPERTY, THAT THE SIDING <br />ON THE HOUSE AND THE GARAGE MATCH, THAT T HERE BE ONE <br />DffiVEWAY ON THE PROPERTY, AND THAT THE GARAGE AND <br />PROPERTY IN GENF.,RAL CONFORM TO AI_I_ CITY ORDINANCE <br />REQUIREMENTS <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by LaValle. <br />Ayes (5) Fahey, LaValle, Montour, Anderson, Scalze. <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />Fahey informed Mrs. Mertes that the Council would be willing to consider <br />additional square footage if the additional garage space were added to the <br />attached garage. Fahey pointed out that this would provide more garage space <br />for the applicant and would have less of an impact on the neighborhood. <br />The City Administrator noted that CUP approval lapses if not acted upon <br />within six mouths. If that is the case, the applicant would have to submit a <br />written request for extension of the CUP approval. <br />PUD PURMIT - Mayor Fahey opened the public hearing to consider au application for <br />2945 COUNTRY Planned Unit Development Permit allowing construction of a 16,1 O6 square <br />D:RIVIJ - foot office/warehouse building at 2945 Country Drive as proposed by R. J. <br />R. J. MARCO Marco Construction. It was noted that the Planning Commission has <br />CONSTRUCTION recommended approval of the PUD Permit subject to compliance with the <br />recommendations of the City Planner and City Engineer. <br />Jaclc Bougie, 2921 Condit, reported that he has discussed the potential <br />subdivision of his property with the City Administrator. As part of that <br />discussion, the City Administrator informed him that the City would want 17 <br />feet of right-of--way from his front yard. Bougie indicated that right-of--way for <br />Condit Street has already come from his property and he referenced a property <br />survey that was done in 1958. Bougie felt any additional right-of--way needed <br />should come from the east side of Condit Street Therefore, the Council should <br />take whatever right-of-way it needs from the property being discussed this <br />evening. <br />Bougie referenced Council meeting minutes from 1985 That reference the Zoch <br />property and the need for additional right-of--way for Condit Street. These <br />minutes indicate that 8.5 feet should come from the west and 8.5 feet should <br />come from the east. Elaine Zoch reported that at the time the right-ofway was <br />