Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />OCTOBER 10, 2001 <br />The City Administrator also felt the feasibility of improving and relocating <br />Market Place Drive should be determined at this time given the proposed <br />addition of senior housing to this area. <br />Mr. LaValle introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTIONNO. 2001-70-232-AUTHORIZING THE CITY <br />ENGINEER TO PREPARE OR UPDATE FEASH37LITY STUDIES FOR <br />THE FOLLOWING IMPROVEMENTS: <br />ELI ROAD/DESOTO STREET <br />MARKET PLACE DRIVE <br />TWIN I AKE AREA <br />The fa~egoing resolution was duly seconded by Anderson. <br />Ayes (5) LaValle, Anderson, Montour, Scalze, Fahey. <br />Nays (0). Resolution decla~~ed adopted. <br />AMENITY The Public Works Director reported that Canadian Days would like the <br />PURCHASES ability to hang flags along their parade route; therefore, he presented the <br />FOR LITTLE Council with pricing for flag holders for installation on street lights on <br />CANADA ROAD Little Canada Road. )stimated cost is $98 per light, and the Director asked the <br />Council for direction as to how many flag holders should be purchased. <br />The City Administrator recommended that funding for this purchase could <br />come from the Capital Improvement Budget. It did not appear that Canadian <br />Days had adequate funds to share in this cost. He also recommended the <br />purchase of up to 41 flag holders (equal to the number of poles on the north <br />side of Little Canada Road), suggesting that staff will come up with a layout <br />for flag installation. He further noted that price checking will continue on this <br />item to see if there are any less expensive options available. <br />Mr. Fahey introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2001-]0-233 -AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF <br />UP TO 47 FLAG HOLDERS FOR INSTALLATION ON STREET LIGHTS <br />ON LITTLE CANADA ROAD AS RECOMMENDED 73Y THE PUBLIC <br />WORKS DIRECTOR AND THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Scalze. <br />Ayes (5) Fahey, Scalze, Montour, LaValle, Anderson. <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />iz <br />