Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />DECEMBER 19, 2001 <br />Gosman indicated that they would like some assistance from the City with <br />putting access through to Rice Street, whether that assistance comes in the <br />form of a tax abatement, or assistance with the purchase of the Anderson <br />property. Scalze pointed out that once the City gets involved in providing <br />assistance, then all the taxpayers are involved. <br />Gosman pointed out that if the Anderson property could be acquired and <br />combined with this site, the development potential substantially increases. <br />Gosman reported that the Anderson property is (or sale, however, the asking <br />price is quite high. <br />Fahey asked if there was anyone from the general public interested in <br />commenting on this matter. <br />"fom Duray reported that he has discussed this development proposal with <br />Messrs. Rustad, Harstad, and Anderson and they all agree that this is a good <br />transitional use for the area. The area of concern, however, is access. It is <br />their feeling that access should be via Rice Street. Duray reported that given <br />the hill on Park Street, additional traffic on that road would not be in the <br />interests of public safety. <br />A Park Street resident expressed concern with additional traffic on Park Street <br />from this development. He also asked when the property was zoned to <br />commercial, suggested that it be rezoned to accommodate residential <br />development rather than commercial- Scalze reported that the property has <br />been zoned commercial for over 30 years and this zoning has been in place <br />prior to the existence of Park Street. "fhe commercial zoning likely came to be <br />because the property abuts Rice Street. <br />Fahey pointed out that the City has been presented with concepts for <br />townhome development and senior housing development on this site. The <br />property owner is now proposing the townoffice concept. Fahey reported that <br />the Council supported the development of townhomes on the site, and <br />indicated that he would support the townoffice concept if access were via Rice <br />Street. <br />The property owner indicated that he favored a residential development on the <br />site and indicated that traffic from a residential development onto Park Su'eet <br />was acceptable to him, but traffic from a townoftce development was not. <br />Fahey indicated that the issue at this point is whether or not the Watershed will <br />allow pond relocation to provide for access to Rice Street. Fahey felt that if <br />not, the City should consider rezoning the property to residential to allow for <br />townhome development on the site. Fahey suggested that the developer work <br />hard to get access via Rice Street for the townoffice development, because his <br />