My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-23-00 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
05-23-00 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2009 2:24:51 PM
Creation date
8/6/2008 10:41:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />MAY 23, 2000 <br />ZONING CODE Fahey opened the public hearing to consider an amendment to the Zoning <br />AMENDMENT Code relating to the definition of medical clinics. It was noted that the <br />RELATING TO Planning Commission has recommended approval of the amendment. <br />MEDICAL <br />CLINICS There was no one present from the general public wishing to comment on <br /> this matter. <br />Upon motion by Scalze, seconded by Fahey, the public hearing was <br />closed. <br />Given that there weren't four members of the Council present, this matter <br />had to be tabled. <br />Mrs. Scalze introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOL UTION NO. 2000-5-133 - TA73LING ACTION ON THE <br />AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING CODE RELATIVE TO THE <br />DEFINITION OF MEDICAL CLINICb' TO THE CONSENT AGENDA <br />OF THE JUNE 13, 2000 REGULAR COUNCIL. MEETING <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Fahey. <br />Ayes (3) Scalze, Fahey, Pedersen. <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />AMENDMENT Fahey opened the public hearing to consider an amendment to the <br />TO THE COMP Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Code relating to allowed uses <br />PLAN AND and site plan requirements in the City's Redevelopment District No. <br />ZONING CODE 3-2, Rice Street and Little Canada Road. It was noted that the <br />FOR DISTRICT Planning Commission has recommended approval. <br />3-2 <br />Scalze indicated that she had a concern with the way multi-family housing <br />is addressed and suggested that she would be more comfortable if it were <br />limited to senior citizen housing. Fahey agreed and indicated that he was <br />not in favor of any more multi-family housing other than senior housing. <br />The City Administrator suggested the best way to address the situation <br />may be by precluding certain uses in the PUD District. <br />Fahey again indicated that multi-family housing should be limited to <br />strictly senior housing. Pedersen suggested that the right type of <br />development may make a difference, and suggested that the amendment <br />not be entirely limiting. <br />to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.