Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />OCTOBER 11, 2000 <br />areas. The cities can, however, require joint trenching when the <br />companies construct infrastructure. <br />It was pointed out that Little Canada's ordinance requires that new <br />telecommunications infrastructure be constructed underground. Given the <br />financial implications of this requirement, the telecommunications <br />providers may choose not to provide service in Little Canada. Wilson <br />pointed out that enforcing the underground requirement is a public policy <br />decision that Little Canada will have to make balancing the factor of <br />underground versus providing competition. Wilson also pointed out that <br />the City of Shoreview is discussing a canpromise situation of requiring <br />underground installation at major intersections. A meeting will be held <br />with the Public Works Directors of the ten member cities to discuss these <br />issues and try to reach some common parameters for the cities to enforce. <br />Wilson also indicated that she hoped to get more County involvement in <br />this process given the infrastructure construction that would take place on <br />County roads. <br />Pedersen asked about Qwest's involvement in cable TV services. Wilson <br />reported that Qwest could provide cable TV services, but this would <br />require a document similar to the franchise that AT & T has. <br />Wilson pointed out that the law does not allow cities to simply say no to <br />use of the public rights-of--way. Consideration must be given to requests <br />for competitive telecommunications franchises. However, the companies <br />making these requests must meet legal, technical, and financial <br />requirements in order to be granted a franchise. Again, the report on the <br />two competitive franchise applications will be forthcoming over the next <br />few months. <br />The Council thanked Wilson for her presentation. <br />WATER The Council reviewed the request of Susan Nelson, 2995 Vanderbie <br />AVAILABILITY Street, for waiving the water availability charge resulting from the <br />CHARGE connection of her home to City water. It was noted that Nelson reported <br />that had she known about the $300 water availability charge, it would <br />have made a difference in her decision to connect to City water. <br />Council discussed the fact that Nelson indicated that her option would <br />have been to replace the pump on her well, and that the expense for pump <br />replacement varied greatly depending on the type of pump involved. <br />