Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />Parks & Recreation Commission <br />March 2, 2000 <br />The Parks & Recreation Director stated that the City will be talking to the Provinces <br />Aparhnents to see if they are interested in placement of a path from their property to the park. <br />The Provinces' property is adjacent to the park property. <br />Howe commented that some residents would like the name of the park to be Rondeau Park in <br />honor of the person who had originally owned the property. The Parks & Recreation <br />Director felt that the name should be decided at a later date. <br />The Parks & Recreation Director stated that a 5-foot trail instead of an 8-foot trail could be <br />installed. The Public Works Director preferred an 8-foot trail if one was installed so that it <br />would be easier to maintain during the winter. However, the Parks & Recreation Director <br />felt that the trail may not have to be plowed. <br />The Parks & Recreation Director commented that the Park Consultant was in favor of the <br />pathway. The Director felt that the path is not as necessary as he felt it once was when there <br />were 35 homes planned instead of the current 22. <br />Sackett Glaser felt that the pathway would be an access to the park for only a few people. <br />Broten recommended eliminating the path from Gordie Howe's townhon:e protect located <br />at Little Canada Road and Jackson Street. <br />Motion seconded by Gray. <br />Motion carried 7- 0. <br />O'NEIL The Parks & Recreation Director stated that the O'Neil property is located at 666 Keller <br />DIVISION Parkway between Keller and LaBore Road. The division proposed is a simple lot split and <br />the Park Master Plan does not identify parkland in that area. <br />Gray recommended accepting cash in lieu of land for the park charge on the O'Neil <br />property located on Keller Parkway. <br />Motion seconded by Sackett Glaser. <br />Motion carried 7 - 0. <br />PIONEER The Parks & Recreation Director stated that the City's Code Enforcement Officer has been <br />PARKING inspecting the City's properties to make sure we are in compliance with our own codes. <br />Pioneer Park has been found to be in violation of our parking ordinance. According to our <br />zoning code, 237 parking spaces are required for the park. However, we only have 181. <br />The Parks & Recreation Director stated that the City has three options to correct the problem. <br />We could add 56 parking spaces, a conditional use permit could be applied for showing the <br />additional parking to be constructed in the future, or the code could be amended to make the <br />park compliant. He commented that there are other City parks that are also non-compliant <br />because they have been designated as neighborhood parks with limited or no parking. He <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />