Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />JANUARY 13, 2000 <br />Montour asked how the ordinance considered the attachment of <br />individual letters to a building. The Planner reported that the <br />Architectural Guidelines encourage the use of individual letters. <br />The way the sign area is then calculated is that a rectangle is drawn <br />encompassing the letters that the size of that rectangle is used as <br />the sign size. <br />Carson recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit <br />allowing additional signage on a multiple occupancy business <br />building located at 75 West Viking Drive as requested by R. J. <br />Marco Construction subject to compliance with the <br />recommendations of the City Planner. <br />Motion seconded by Montour. <br />Motion carried 6 - 0. <br />ALLOWABLE The City Planner reported that there is the need to clarify <br />SETBACK allowable setback encroachments. The issue came up when a <br />ENCROACH- property owner installed a patio up to a property line. The <br />MENTS neighbor questioned whether or not this is allowed, and it is staffls <br /> interpretation that it is allowed under the current ordinance. The <br /> Planner indicated that because of the questions that arose, it was <br /> felt that the ordinance should be clarified. <br />The Planner reviewed a proposed ordinance amendment that <br />redefines decks and patios. He noted that anything over six inches <br />in height would be considered a deck, would require a building <br />permit, and would have to be setback at least five feet from the <br />property line. A patio would be defined as no more than six inches <br />above the immediately adjacent grade at any point within two feet <br />of the patio. <br />Knudsen recommended that a public hearing be called to consider <br />amending the Zoning Code clarifying allowable setback <br />encroachments as recommended by the City Planner. <br />Motion seconded by Montour <br />Motion carried 6 - 0. <br />tx <br />