My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-09-00 Planning Comm. Minutes
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
03-09-00 Planning Comm. Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/6/2008 2:34:29 PM
Creation date
8/6/2008 2:26:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MARCH 9, 2000 <br />commercial location and the home occupation will no longer be an <br />issue by the end of one year. <br />Montour pointed out the recommendation of the City Planner that <br />employees' vehicles should be parked in the driveway rather than <br />on the street. <br />A property owner in the area indicated that she is concerned about <br />the entire area. She pointed out that this is a residential area, but it <br />has more of a commercial feel to it. She noted that the Bixby's <br />have five service vehicles parked in their driveway. <br />Duray asked Mr. Bixby how long he has been operating his <br />business from his home. Bixby replied that he has operated the <br />business from his house since he built it in 1980. The business has <br />grown since it was begun. <br />One of the property owners from the area agreed that the business <br />has grown and felt it has reached the point where it should be <br />located in a commercial area. <br />Shelly Frison, Rose Lane property owner, pointed out that there <br />have been parking problems on Rose Lane for a number of years. <br />As a result of those problems, the City put limited the hours for on- <br />streetparking. Frison indicated that at times it is very difficult to <br />get in and off Rose Lane because of these parking problems. <br />Frison felt that the Planner's recommendation to allow the business <br />to continue for one year was too long. <br />The City Planner pointed out that trucks would be in the driveway <br />at night and employees' vehicles in the driveway during the day. <br />This should help the alleviate some of the on-street parking <br />problems during the interim period he is recommending that the <br />business be allowed to operate. <br />Montour felt the on-street parking was somewhat of an <br />enforcement issue. <br />Duray asked if Mr. Bixby has had the correct perform for his <br />business. The Zoning Administrator reported that no permit has <br />been issued for the home occupation. The City received its first <br />complaint in December of 1999 and the need for a home <br />occupation permit was discussed with Mr. Bixby during January's <br />monthly City Planner's hours. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.