Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />AUGUST 27, 2008 <br />the 3 foot standard feeling that the piles of storage would grow. Allan <br />stated that she would prefer to have containers than small piles of storage <br />scattered here and there on a site. Keis felt it was difficult to define when <br />storage had to occur within a container, and stated that he did not think all <br />storage would be outdoors. <br />Blesener pointed out that some storage will fit in a container and some <br />will not. He also noted that some storage that occurs on pallets would <br />need to be accessed by a forklift. <br />The Planner indicated that it is a matter of choosing a size that triggers <br />storage inside a container. He noted that the current Code defines that <br />storage less than 3 feet in height, width, and length is prohibited from <br />being stored directly on the ground. This storage has to occur within a <br />container, indoors, or on a movable trailer. Storage larger than the 3 foot <br />dimension can be stored outside on the ground. The Planner indicated that <br />the 3 foot dimension was chosen because it is the size of a pallet. <br />McGraw felt that the Council should regulate the appearance of the <br />storage containers and the orderliness of properties with outdoor storage. <br />He noted that On-Site Air Temp has offered to paint their storage <br />containers, and felt it was not unreasonable to include this requirement as <br />part of the Code. Keis stated that he had no problem with storage <br />containers as long as they are well maintained and painted. <br />Allan asked if it would be difficult to write the Code to ensure that small <br />piles of storage on the ground are prohibited. The Planner pointed out that <br />there are a lot of variables with outdoor storage, noting the various <br />dimensions of materials that could be stored. He felt that the 3 foot width, <br />length, and height was a good starting point as it related to pallet size. <br />Dave Holm, On-Site Air Temp, stated this support for the allowance of <br />storage containers based on property size. He felt this formula was fair to <br />property owners regardless of the size property they own. Holm also <br />indicated that whenever feasible, property owners will store materials and <br />equipment inside. He also felt that allowing storage containers will help <br />clean up some of the smaller storage items getting these items within <br />containers. <br />There was no one else present from the general public wishing to <br />comment on this matter. <br />Upon motion by Montour, seconded by Allan, the public hearing was <br />closed. <br />