My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-01-2021 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
12-01-2021 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2022 10:30:03 AM
Creation date
1/13/2022 10:29:56 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />DECEMBER 1, 2021 <br />Mr. Eric Anderson, Poolside, stated the fence shown is already there, and they will be updating <br />i, ;n +ly tl,oro LTo �+ +oa tl,A r,a��`J part of the build -n ��C�oll d be about 25 feet high. He <br />V1�llal. 1J Vt.Lllenl.l 1V1V. 11V �7Lal.Vu EX-R. 11V ll. vt �iiv va.i.iiuiii v,...iu vv about .�v.. �/ <br />stated the business owners want to get everything into one site to cut down on the amount of going <br />back and forth between their multiple building spaces. Keis asked how long construction would <br />take. The Contractor stated if they can get materials, it should take about four months to complete, <br />and the business will remain open. He stated the owners want to avoid outside storage and want to <br />make the site look much better for the neighborhood. <br />Mr. Dave Dorn, 2739 Jackson Street, stated that he had been going back and forth with the Poolside <br />owners for years to finally get fencing installed along Jackson that is not see-thru. He stated <br />Poolside wants to add another entrance onto Jackson Street, but he explained that currently many <br />customers exit on Jackson and turn left, even though there is a sign that says "Dead End," and then <br />they turn around in his driveway. He stated it appears that they now want to add another driveway <br />onto Jackson Street. Mr. Anderson stated that they are allowed to have up to four curb -cuts on their <br />property and currently have two. He explained that their goal for adding a third curb cut is to <br />simplify traffic flow which he feels will eliminate people turning around in Mr. Dom's driveway, <br />and will expand the area for a turning radius for the trucks. <br />Mr. Jerry Maleitzke, 116 Little Canada Road East, stated that he is the neighbor on the north side, <br />and his main concern is the fencing. He stated that there is a small fence now, but Poolside is now a <br />big enough business that he wants a fence along the whole stretch of his property. Mr. Anderson <br />said there will be a new fence, and they are willing to put a full fence along that side. Mr. <br />Maleitzke asked where the semi -trucks would be coming in. Mr. Anderson said they would use <br />County Road C and Jackson, and they are working to make the turning radius and layout better for <br />the truck traffic. <br />Mr. Dorn stated that when Poolside first built the extra building, the semis were supposed to be <br />loading and unloading on their property, but they do it on Jackson Street instead. Mr. Maleitzke <br />stated that they also want the fence on their south property line to help with safety from theft since <br />he has chased a few people out of the Poolside property, and to help with noise. McGraw asked if <br />there was any way to have the semis unload in the parking lot instead of the street. Mr. Anderson <br />stated that with the parking lot reconfigured, it should make it possible for the trucks to maneuver <br />better. <br />Jim Martin, owns the office building next door at 127 County Road C East, and stated there is a <br />strip of land between his building and Poolside's storage building that they have maintained for <br />many years and is used for exiting his building, and wondered if the new fence would be placed <br />closer to his building. Mr. Anderson stated the storage building will be removed and replaced with <br />a parking lot so there should be more room for his exits. <br />The Community Development Director reported that the Planning Commission reviewed the plans <br />and recommended approval of the PUD amendment as proposed. <br />There were no additional comments from the public. Upon motion by Fischer, seconded by Keis, <br />the public hearing was closed. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.