Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />May 13, 2021 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />4 <br />The Development Director noted that there could be consideration to raising that threshold to <br />1,500 square feet if there is desire for that change. She noted that perhaps additional details <br />could then be added related to screening. <br /> <br />Chair Schwalbach replied that most of those requests come from larger lots and have been <br />approved with little discussion. <br /> <br />Mr. Weber continued to review the proposed changes to the general development standards. <br /> <br />Chair Schwalbach referenced the language related to tree removal and replacement and asked if <br />that is a common ratio for redevelopment and whether there would be room to plant that many <br />successful trees. <br /> <br />Mr. Weber confirmed that this is a common ratio for tree replacement. He noted that there is <br />language that the requirement would be required to the extent practical and feasible. He <br />provided additional input on the proposed changes related to the parking requirements. He noted <br />that the existing parking requirements tend to lead to excess parking. He provided additional <br />background information on why the proposed changes were recommended and the information <br />that is based upon. He also provided alternative options. <br /> <br />The Community Development Director stated that she is not aware of any parking issues that <br />existing within Little Canada at this time. She noted that this additional flexibility would allow <br />for different redevelopment activities. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson agreed that the parking required for a use is not always linked to the size <br />of the building but more the intensity of the use. She commented that she would support having <br />increased flexibility in the parking requirements. <br /> <br />Chair Schwalbach agreed and provided two examples of building that have large amounts of <br />excess parking that are highly visible. He noted that the only potential issue he could see is if a <br />large building with a low intensity use changed ownership and use, there could be increased <br />parking demands. <br /> <br />Mr. Weber continued to review the proposed changes to the general development standards. He <br />also provided input as to some of the review comments received by the City Council related to <br />accessory dwelling units, duplexes, and garage door setback requirements. <br /> <br />The Community Development Director commented that she and Mr. Weber will meet again with <br />the City Council to continue the conversation early in the process and continue to gain input. <br /> <br />Mr. Weber stated that next month staff will bring back the proposed changes to the final chapter <br />related to administration and application review. <br />