My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-09-08 Planning Comm. Agenda
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
10-09-08 Planning Comm. Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/3/2008 2:27:52 PM
Creation date
10/3/2008 2:24:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~9~NLTES <br />City Council <br />- .. Oct. 10, 1984 <br />I <br />R & S (Cont.) REQUIRE?TENTS AND ROAD IhIPROVEMENTS ON <br />WOODLYN AVENUE AND THAT THE CUL-DE-SAC <br />AT THE END OF WOODLYN AVENUE BE IPIPROVED <br />AS RECONI^IENDED BY THE PLANNER AND THAT <br />THEP.E BE NO STORAGE OF CARS OR PAF.KING OF <br />CAPS ON THIS PUBLIC STREET <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by ?Sr. Hanson. <br />Ayes (5) Fahey, Hanson, 14ardini, Scalze, Forsberg. <br />Hayes (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />This resolution appears in Resolution Book ;Io. 11, Page 489. <br />tdoodlyn Ave. The Engineer stated that he has reviecaed alternativef+5 of the i~~oodlyn <br />Circulation Avenue circulation plans and determined that a 50 foot right-of-way <br />Plan would nick the corn er of the A. C. Black building. <br />Agenda Mr. Leo AicGough commented that the property owners in the area do <br />Item No. 7 not want the road. ?1rs. Scalze replied that the City wants the <br />road. P1r. Hanson stated that the City wants to settle on a plan <br />for the road. <br />_~ <br />~' b1r. Forsberg informed Mr. 1•;cGough that there are businesses in the <br />area that wish to add on and cannot without a second access to the <br />area. <br />Mr. ?IcGough asked if the City was only interested in getting the <br />easements for the road. I•;r. Fahey replied that this was correct. <br />PIr. Greg Deeb stated that the business are no longer interested in <br />alternative #!5 since the Engineer's survey revealed that the road <br />would take part of the A. C. Blacl: building. <br />Mr. Forsberg pointed out that R & S will not have permission to continue <br />their operation until the road matter is resolved. <br />Air. Zilge asked about the easement that he gave on the east. h7r. <br />Fahey replied that there were problems with the grade in this area. <br />Mr. Manson pointed out that with any blockage of the railroad tracks, <br />there is no way in to the area. <br />^Ir. Deeb felt that the Gervais property should be involved in the <br />road issue. <br />The Engineer staled that there is a low spot in the area encompassed by <br />~ alternative #5 that would cause sewer to have to be brought in from <br />another direction. The Engineer felt that the grade could be raised <br />next to the Black's property and suggested that the s[re:et would be <br />curbed and a storm sewer put in the low area. <br />Page -6- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.