My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-25-2022 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2022
>
05-25-2022 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/27/2022 3:09:01 PM
Creation date
6/27/2022 3:07:53 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />MAY 259 2022 <br />Fischer requested for feedback on why we are not considering the "U" shaped roadway that was <br />suggested by residents. Ms. Duce, stated that after the neighborhood meeting they did review this idea, <br />but they were not able to get enough density since they were trying to lessen the density to the south, <br />and have higher density on the north end, so this road design did not work. <br />Torkelson stated that he had submitted a revision of the site plan, and requests that it be shown and <br />discussed with Lennar to see if it could be done. He noted that he sent it to staff only 48 hours ago and <br />realizes that there has not been time to review it in detail. He explained that in general he is in favor of <br />this development and the density, but stated it is a big and sudden change in density and he recognizes <br />that. He explained his proposed change eliminates the southernmost access road that connects to <br />Vanderbie. He stated by removing this road, it could eliminate headlights shining on the existing <br />home, it would also be closer to County Road D than Allen Avenue so traffic would more likely head <br />north instead of south, and it could make online mapping route from County Road D instead of Allen. <br />He noted that he also suggests a 2-unit building instead of the proposed 6-unit building at the very <br />south end next to the single-family home to lessen the density scaling grade change. <br />The City Administrator stated there may be two issues of concern with this design; public safety and <br />utilities. He asked if there would be any issues with utilities by eliminating the south connection. The <br />Public Works Director stated that he just needs to make sure they can loop the water over to <br />Vanderbie. He explained all of the sewage needs to get down to Allen, so the sewer lines would have <br />to cross over in other areas. <br />Fischer stated that Lennar has been a great partner with this and have been accommodating with design <br />change requests. He stated we are inviting 400 new members in to our community and we want them <br />to be participating members of our community. He noted that he also feels a protectiveness because he <br />lives nearby, but realized that if the U-shaped roadway was put in, we are literally and figuratively <br />turning our backs on these new residents. He stated as far as he is concerned, the right plan is in front <br />of them now. Miller stated she agrees with Fischer, and understands that it is difficult to have a large <br />community come in, but thinks this will be a really nice community and likes the updated proposal. <br />Keis stated that he never liked the U road design, and allowing access to the parks and rest of the city <br />is only fair. Torkelson asked if the rest of the Council thinks it is exclusionary to eliminate the south <br />road. Miller stated that she feels Torkelson's design does cut off the neighborhood. Torkelson stated <br />he was trying to make some concessions in order to satisfy the existing neighborhood concerns. <br />Fischer introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTIONNO. 2022-5-70 'APPROVE THE PRELIMINARY PLA TDA TED 523-2022 <br />FOR THE U.S. HOME, LLCAND LENNAR FOR A 178 TOWNHOME DEVELOPMENT <br />ON 5 PARCELS, AND MOVE FORWARD WITH FINAL PLAT, VARIANCES, <br />REZONING AND A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT: <br />PID# 05-29-22-21-0024 PID# 05-29-22-21-0032 PID# 05-29-22-21-0031 <br />PID# 05-29-22-21-0030 PID# 05-29-22-21-0029 <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Torkelson. . <br />Con <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.