My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-11-2022 Workshop Packet
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2022
>
05-11-2022 Workshop Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2022 6:17:58 PM
Creation date
7/27/2022 5:42:19 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br />and per capita. Prioritizing infrastructure improvements on the west side of the city would help in <br />distributing bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure more equitably. <br />The CRASH RISK analysis applied a model created by researchers at the University of Minnesota to <br />determine the relative risk of pedestrian- or cyclist-involved crashes on all streets and intersections in <br />the City. Intersections and street segments with the highest crash risk for both pedestrians and bicyclists <br />are clustered along the entire length of Rice Street and along Little Canada Road west of Interstate 35E <br />(Figures 2 and 3). Improvements to bike and pedestrian infrastructure should be considered in the <br />following areas: Rice Street where it crosses Minnesota Highway 36; the square formed by Rice Street, <br />Little Canada Road, and Market Place Drive; and Little Canada Road between County Road C and <br />Centerville Road. <br />The CONNECTIVITY analysis used a dataset of important destinations - including schools, transit stops, <br />and commercial areas - to determine which streets would have the largest impact if the City added <br />pedestrian and/or cycling infrastructure to them. For bike connectivity, the street segments which <br />would increase connectivity for the most people to the chosen set of destinations if they were improved <br />are along Rice Street north of County Road C and Little Canada Road west of County Road C. For <br />pedestrians, the same holds true, with the addition of segments of Edgerton Street and Centerville <br />Street (Figures 4 and 5). <br />The ECONOMIC analysis classified Little Canada’s industry sectors into four categories: growing, <br />emerging, transforming, and declining. Coupled with data on wage competitiveness compared to the <br />metro area, these classifications inform prioritization for infrastructure improvements in areas near <br />businesses most likely to compete regionally for employment, supporting transportation equity in job <br />access. Leveraging existing economic trends, this will maximize capital inflows for the community and <br />create sustainable economic growth. This analysis found that growing sectors such as Wholesale Trade <br />and Retail Trade; as well as transforming sectors such as Construction; Real Estate and Rental and <br />Leasing; Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services; and Other <br />Services (except Public Administration) are viable candidates to be supported by bike and pedestrian <br />infrastructure improvements, especially connections to public transit. In 2019, these sectors made up <br />55.9% of total employment in Little Canada. <br />Survey <br />In the online survey, we asked respondents about their transportation behaviors, their thoughts on the <br />current transportation infrastructure, and what kinds of improvements they would like to see. We <br />advertised the survey on the City’s website, the City’s social media, and with flyers distributed at transit <br />stops, parks, apartment complexes, manufactured home parks, and several commercial establishments. <br />The locations for these flyers were chosen based on observations during our initial site visit, preliminary <br />spatial analysis of the city, and bus stop boarding data. While we knew we couldn't get a representative <br />sample with this survey, we employed purposeful convenience sampling to prioritize hearing from those <br />who would most benefit from potential improvements: people who walk, bike, and use transit in the <br />City. <br />After omitting incomplete responses, our survey had 162 self-selected respondents, 51.3% of whom <br />identified as male, and 46.1% of whom identified as female. Little Canada residents reported a near- <br />even split of living east or west of Interstate 35E, with a difference of only one respondent. Given the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.