Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Creating and Sustaining Equity through Pedestrian, Bicycle, <br />and Public Transit Connectivity <br />Executive Summary <br />Jacob Berger, Regina Burstein, Frank Koenen, Jarred Paquin <br />Graduate students at the Humphrey School of Public Affairs <br />The City of Little Canada is a first ring suburb of about 10,000 people north of St. Paul. In its 2040 <br />Comprehensive Plan, the City determined that its pedestrian, bicycle, and public transit networks do not <br />adequately meet the equity, safety, and accessibility needs of the community. The City is interested in <br />upgrading these systems to improve the lives of current and future residents, ensuring that “people will <br />be able to enjoy Little Canada as young singles, childless couples, families and empty-nesters and <br />beyond” (Comp Plan Chapter 2: Land Use). The City is especially interested in reimagining its <br />transportation network to serve the needs of a growing population with diverse abilities and changing <br />characteristics due to factors such as aging, retirement, remote work, and child care considerations. To <br />this end, Little Canada seeks recommendations on how to equitably prioritize improvements to its <br />transportation infrastructure to provide safe, accessible, and connected pathways for people walking, <br />rolling, biking, and taking public transit. <br />In conjunction with the City, we drafted the following research questions: <br />1. How can the city improve and enhance the equity, accessibility, connectivity, and safety of <br />pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users? <br />2. What improvement and enhancement strategies can the city use to prioritize improvements to <br />pedestrian, bicyclists, and transit infrastructure? <br />3. What community engagement strategies can the city use to engage residents in transportation <br />planning, paying particular attention to equity, accessibility, connectivity, and safety? <br />To answer the above questions, we conducted four analyses - demographic, crash risk, connectivity, and <br />economic – and we sought feedback from the community in the form of an online survey and several <br />key informant interviews. <br />Technical Foundations for Increasing Equity in Connectivity <br />The DEMOGRAPHIC analysis involved evaluating whether there is an equitable distribution of bicycle <br />and pedestrian infrastructure in the City based on income, race, car ownership, and tenure. Bicycle and <br />pedestrian infrastructure miles has some level of inequitable distribution when evaluating demographic <br />data (Table 1 and 2). Race and median income were important factors in the distribution of bicycle and <br />pedestrian infrastructure. The small neighborhood northwest of the Interstate 35E and Minnesota <br />Highway 36 interchange has a large amount of multi-family homes with a population diverse in race, <br />income, and vehicle ownership, but low amount of bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure both in total